2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22971-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Software Defect Prediction Model Based on Stacked Denoising Auto-Encoder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To answer the second research question, we compare the performance of the proposed model with four state-of-the-art deep learning models: Defect Prediction with Deep Forest (DPDF) [53], Genetic Algorithm-Deep Neural Network (GA-DNN) [54], Deep Belief Network Prediction Model (DBNPM) [55], and Stack Denoising Auto-Encoder (SDAE) [56] and present the results in Tabs. 9 and 10.…”
Section: Rq2: the Performance Of The Proposed Model Compared To The State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To answer the second research question, we compare the performance of the proposed model with four state-of-the-art deep learning models: Defect Prediction with Deep Forest (DPDF) [53], Genetic Algorithm-Deep Neural Network (GA-DNN) [54], Deep Belief Network Prediction Model (DBNPM) [55], and Stack Denoising Auto-Encoder (SDAE) [56] and present the results in Tabs. 9 and 10.…”
Section: Rq2: the Performance Of The Proposed Model Compared To The State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the experimental results might not be generalizable to other datasets, which might produce better or worse results for each software defect prediction model used in this study. However, the dataset we opted for is often used in previous software defect detection [53][54][55][56]. Different results can be generated by using different sets of software metrics.…”
Section: Threats To External Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%