2015
DOI: 10.1002/sres.2383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft Systems Methodology and Interdisciplinarity in Management Education

Abstract: One negative point of management education is the lack of integration between the disciplines that restrains a systemic view. Moreover, there is not much research about an interdisciplinary approach to management. This paper applies soft systems methodology to develop a scale of interdisciplinarity in order to evaluate management education. We conclude that interdisciplinarity in management education is a social system that requires complex thinking development for management students. The scale addresses thre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of interdisciplinary integration in the educational process is considered in foreign studies in different contexts. Cezarino, Liboni, Oliveira, and Caldana (2016) solve the problem of integrating academic disciplines from the perspective of managing this process. The authors attempt to connect academic disciplines by changing the structure of the curriculum, organizing the educational process and teaching methods.…”
Section: Analysis Of Foreign Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of interdisciplinary integration in the educational process is considered in foreign studies in different contexts. Cezarino, Liboni, Oliveira, and Caldana (2016) solve the problem of integrating academic disciplines from the perspective of managing this process. The authors attempt to connect academic disciplines by changing the structure of the curriculum, organizing the educational process and teaching methods.…”
Section: Analysis Of Foreign Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De la recuperación de documentos de investigación sobre la evaluación de la interdisciplinariedad, se consideraron diez investigaciones realizadas entre el 2011 y 2017 que tuvieran el objetivo de medir diversos factores de la interdisciplinariedad en diferentes contextos educativos. Posteriormente se identificaron y clasificaron las dimensiones propuestas por dichas aportaciones de acuerdo a la naturaleza de su objeto de estudio, englobándolas en tres dimensiones sugeridas en concordancia a la evaluación hecha sobre el desarrollo de competencias: a) evaluación del conocimiento: Reconocimiento de perspectivas disciplinares (Lattuca et al, 2013), experiencia holística de aprendizaje y aprendizaje interdisciplinario (Self y Baek, 2017), experiencia interdisciplinaria en el laboratorio (Walczak y Van Wylen, 2015), requerimiento curricular y estructura organizacional para la interdisciplinariedad (Knight et al, 2012) y la escala de interdisciplinariedad (Cezarino et al, 2015); b) evaluación de habilidades: habilidades interdisciplinarias (Lattuca et al, 2013), pensamiento interdisciplinario (Liu et al, 2011), pensamiento crítico y necesidad de cognición (Lattuca et al, 2017); y c) evaluación de actitudes: comportamiento reflexivo (Lattuca et al, 2013), actitudes positivas hacia la alfabetización (Lattuca et al, 2017), pensamiento reflexivo (Tutticci et al, 2016), capacidad interdisciplinaria, relaciones interpersonales, autonomía y compromiso académico (Koch et al, 2017), y colaboración interdisciplinaria (Miles y Rainbird, 2015).…”
Section: Métodounclassified
“…A globalização e o padrão de economia empresarial que surgiram nos séculos XX e XXI mostram que as corporações modernas de alta tecnologia não consideram mais o modelo de produção Taylor-Ford como a única estratégia para resolver seus problemas de gestão. As organizações são um todo sistêmico e multidimensional em que todos os aspectos estão ligados e dependem uns dos outros e cada aspecto influencia os outros ou é influenciado por eles (CEZARINO et al, 2016). Fato esse que pode ser considerado para as instituições de ensino.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Sendo assim, os alunos deveriam ser introduzidos a uma maneira crítica e sistêmica de pensar, evitando abordagens baseadas em uma única disciplina. Entretanto, ainda existem instituições de ensino superior, especialmente seus administradores, que parecem não estar cientes das mudanças dos negócios, ou, se estão, seus programas não estão atualizados com as novas técnicas e métodos exigidos pelas organizações para operar de forma eficaz (CEZARINO et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified