Soft Law Engagements and Hard Law Preferences: Comparing EU Lobbying Positions between UN Global Compact Signatory Firms and Other Interest Group Types

Abstract

Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gone “mainstream,” the relationship between CSR and corporate political activities (CPA) has received little scholarly attention. This is problematic because firms potentially have a more sizable impact through their lobbying activities for socially and environmentally beneficial (or unbeneficial) public policies than through their own operations. This paper investigates if, and how, UN Global Compact signatory firms differ in their policy preferences on key EU proposals compared to other interest groups. To capture state-of-the-art data on firms’ policy preferences, I draw from the INTEREURO database, which includes firms’ lobbying positions on forty-three directives and twenty-seven regulations covering 112 public policy issues in the European Union. Statistical results show that Global Compact signatory firms significantly lobby for stricter regulation than non-signatory firms and industry associations, however, their positions are still lower than nonbusiness groups. These results are similar across various public policy issues and suggest that the regulatory preferences of firms’ participating in soft law CSR initiatives are more aligned with stakeholders' interests. This paper contributes to public policy literature exploring the relationship between hard and soft law as well as literature studying the political representation of divergent interest.

The Intricacies of Firms’ Support for Labor Provisions in US Trade Agreements

“…I would expect that to be the case even if those firms are otherwise active promoters of voluntary regulations along the supply chain, such as Intel and Levi's. This adds even more nuance to works that expect firms with greater soft law commitments on sustainable development to be more likely to also support 'hard' sustainability regulations (see Van den Broek, 2021).…”

Affluence, congruence, and lobbying success in EU climate policy

“…A valuable contribution to future research would be taking a more longitudinal, qualitative approach to study the dynamics of congruence and interest group success over time. This would also provide deeper insight into the extent to which groups use strategic positioning in their externally facing lobbying and how this compares to their lobbying behind the scenes, a research line that has been fruitful in studying the differences between companies’ lobbying activities and corporate social responsibility policies (Van den Broek 2021; Bernhagen et al 2022).…”

Litigations with the home State and internationalization

“…We broaden this call to study the interdependencies between the legal dimension of the nonmarket strategy and the remaining two. Although recent papers have linked corporate political activity and corporate social responsibility more clearly (den Hond et al , 2014; Liedong et al , 2017; van den Broek, 2021), there is still a major disconnect in the study of these two dimensions and actions in the legal domain. Our findings suggest that firms’ homegrown compliance knowledge shapes FDI efforts.…”