1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-111x(199901)14:1<63::aid-int5>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft consensus and network dynamics in group decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we present a brief review of the original soft consensus model introduced in [27]. Our point of departure is a set of individual fuzzy preference relations.…”
Section: The Soft Dissensus Measure and The Consensus Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we present a brief review of the original soft consensus model introduced in [27]. Our point of departure is a set of individual fuzzy preference relations.…”
Section: The Soft Dissensus Measure and The Consensus Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , a m } for the set of decisional alternatives is discussed in [27] and [29]. Here, for the sake of simplicity, we assume that the alternatives available are only two (m = 2), which means that each individual preference relation R i has only one degree of freedom, denoted by x i = r i 12 .…”
Section: The Soft Dissensus Measure and The Consensus Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, DMs may express their preferences by imprecise formats, such as value ranges, linguistic variables and fuzzy numbers 9 . Considerable efforts have been attached to the MAGDM with inaccurate or incomplete information and many approaches to solve this problem have been reported in the existing literature 11,10,5,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%