2015
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i24/79989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft Computation Technique based Fire Evacuation System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these transformation domains, the data are very well-segregated and show well-organized clusters [10][11][12]21]. Furthermore, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Decision Tree (DT), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) analyses were used with different kernels and multilayer perceptron (MLP)-based classifiers for achieving superior classification performance over the considered dataset of sixteen types of fire smoke [13,[22][23][24]. The MLP-based classifier, trained using 2320 training data samples in the SPCA transformed analysis space domain, outperformed all the other transformation spaces considered and achieved 'all correct' classification accuracy of the 80 test samples belonging to the six classes of fire.…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these transformation domains, the data are very well-segregated and show well-organized clusters [10][11][12]21]. Furthermore, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Decision Tree (DT), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) analyses were used with different kernels and multilayer perceptron (MLP)-based classifiers for achieving superior classification performance over the considered dataset of sixteen types of fire smoke [13,[22][23][24]. The MLP-based classifier, trained using 2320 training data samples in the SPCA transformed analysis space domain, outperformed all the other transformation spaces considered and achieved 'all correct' classification accuracy of the 80 test samples belonging to the six classes of fire.…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we used many popular classifiers such as KNN, NB, LR, DT, SVM, and MLP. Further details of these classifiers can be found in the literature [9,13,[21][22][23][24]. Among these popular classifiers, the MLP-based classifier outperforms the other types of classifiers.…”
Section: Contextual Background Of Data Pre-processing and Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%