2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sodium intercalation/de-intercalation mechanism in Na4MnV(PO4)3 cathode materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the relationship between the heat generation within the batteries and their electrochemical performances has not yet been well‐studied. During the past several years, the authors’ research team has focused mainly on the development of new compounds as electrode materials for both lithium and SIBs, which include crystalline α‐CrPO 4 , Alluaudite, and Nascion‐type structures …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relationship between the heat generation within the batteries and their electrochemical performances has not yet been well‐studied. During the past several years, the authors’ research team has focused mainly on the development of new compounds as electrode materials for both lithium and SIBs, which include crystalline α‐CrPO 4 , Alluaudite, and Nascion‐type structures …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sodium‐ion batteries (SIBs) have emerged as a valuable replacement for the energy storage market with its low price and large‐scale availability [4–6] . Other than its abundant nature, sodium displays similar electrochemical properties with its lithium counterpart, making it an excellent substitute for lithium counterpart [6–9] . SIBs had their beginnings in high‐temperature cells like Na/NiCl 2 and Na−S, which were commercialized into grid‐scale energy storage systems (ESS) and some other applications [10–14] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sodium ions (Na + ) has a larger ionic radius (1.02 Å) when compared to lithium ions (Li + ) (0.76 Å), leading to inadequate performance. The performance of SIBs is also suffering from sluggish ionic transportation, the formation of undesired phases, and lack of phase stability [7,8,15,16] . Moreover, sodium has a higher standard potential than lithium and is also significantly more massive than lithium leading to lower energy densities, contributing to plague SIBs [8] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the large size of Na + ions (1.02 vs 0.76 Å for Li + ion) can negatively affect the transport properties of ions in the batteries . Nonetheless, sodium super ion conductors (NASICON‐type) consisting of a 3D framework structure contain large enough channels and stable chemical bonds to facilitate the facile intercalation/deintercalation of Na + …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%