1977
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sodium efflux from voltage clamped squid giant axons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stimulated extra Na influx, K efflux, and K influx are significantly greater in Myxicola than in squid (Table 4) and are therefore much closer to the theoretical values for squid predicted by the equations of Hodgkin and Huxley (1952, at 6~ cf, Cohen & Landowne, 1974;Landowne & Scruggs, 1976;Landowne, 1977). However, the agreement is probably fortuitous as net ionic currents during computed action potentials are several-fold lower in Myxicola than in squid (compare Goldman & Schauf, 1973;Goldman et al, 1975, to Hodgkin & Huxley, 1952.…”
Section: Resting and Stimulated Fluxes Of Na And Ksupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stimulated extra Na influx, K efflux, and K influx are significantly greater in Myxicola than in squid (Table 4) and are therefore much closer to the theoretical values for squid predicted by the equations of Hodgkin and Huxley (1952, at 6~ cf, Cohen & Landowne, 1974;Landowne & Scruggs, 1976;Landowne, 1977). However, the agreement is probably fortuitous as net ionic currents during computed action potentials are several-fold lower in Myxicola than in squid (compare Goldman & Schauf, 1973;Goldman et al, 1975, to Hodgkin & Huxley, 1952.…”
Section: Resting and Stimulated Fluxes Of Na And Ksupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The Qlo ofNa efflux is greater than 3 below 5 ~ and less than 2 above 10 ~ Cohen and Landowne (1974) have reported that the extra Na influx and efflux associated with electrical activity has a Q10 near unity, in contrast to a Q10<0.5 predicted by Hodgkin and Huxley (1952). Recently Landowne (1977) has accounted for part of the discrepancy with the finding of a temperature-dependent component of Na efflux that requires external Na and therefore deviates from the principle of independence of unidirectional fluxes. In two experiments in which the temperature was raised from 5 to 10 or 17 ~ and then returned to 5 ~ the Qlo of stimulated Na efflux from Myxicola axons was only slightly different from 1.0 (Table 5B).…”
Section: Temperature Dependence Of Na Effluxmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Because of the Na/K pump action, it is mainly intracellular, though it flows extracellularly during cell membrane repolarization [43,55]. Moreover, its transmembrane movement is related to H + movement, in the regulation of blood pH, and to cell volume [1,56,57]. Therefore, an increase in serum K concentration may be due to morphofunctional membrane alteration, cell lysis, in particular hemolysis, inorganic acidosis, and renal insufficiency or failure [1,56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an increase was never seen, even at low initial quantal contents. A final reason for suspecting that temperature-dependent changes in Ca2+ influx do not account for the temperature sensitivity of evoked release is that in squid axons the action potential-dependent Ca2+ and Na+ influxes actually decrease with increasing temperature (Hodgkin & Keynes, 1957;Landowne, 1977). Thus although the evidence is indirect, it appears that the temperature sensitivity of evoked release is due mainly to changes in rate-limiting steps other than Ca2+ influx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synaptic delay would not be expected to change if the temperature jump merely increased Ca2+ influx, because the minimal synaptic delay is not sensitive to extracellular [Ca 2+] (Katz & Miledi, 1965b). A second reason is based on Katz & Miledi's (1968) (Hodgkin & Keynes, 1957;Landowne, 1977). Thus although the evidence is indirect, it appears that the temperature sensitivity of evoked release is due mainly to changes in rate-limiting steps other than Ca2+ influx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%