Socket‐shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: A systematic review

Mourya, Akanksha; Mishra, Sunil Kumar; Gaddale, Reetika; Chowdhary, Ramesh

doi:10.1111/jicd.12449

Cited by 28 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A recent systematic review by Mourya et al . [ 20 ] included 11 case reports, 6 case series, 1 human randomized control trial (RCT), 1 technical report, and 2 animal RCT. Recent modifications in Socket-Shield Technique, along with long follow-up studies with increased sample size, provided promising results.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socket shield: An esthetic success?

Durrani

Painuly

Shukla

et al. 2020

J Indian Soc Periodontol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socket shield: An esthetic success?

Durrani

Painuly

Shukla

et al. 2020

J Indian Soc Periodontol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Another technique that has also been described with promising results is the socketshield [24]. The hypothesis behind this technique is that by retaining a section of the buccal side of the root during implant placement the extensive bone loss that occurs on the buccal side of the bone will be reduced [24][25][26]. Regarding this technique, some modifications have appeared since it was first presented, showing promising results [25].…”

Section: Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Concept and Bone Graft Materials Usedmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Use of Autogenous Teeth for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Literature Review

Cenicante¹,

Botelho

Machado

et al. 2021

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Alveolar ridge resorption is a natural consequence of teeth extraction, with unpleasant aesthetic and functional consequences that might compromise a future oral rehabilitation. To minimize the biological consequences of alveolar ridge resorption, several surgical procedures have been designed, the so-called alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques. One important characteristic is the concomitant use of biomaterial in ARP. In the past decade, autogenous teeth as a bone graft material in post-extraction sockets have been proposed with very interesting outcomes, yet with different protocols of preparation. Here we summarize the available evidence on autogenous teeth as a biomaterial in ARP, its different protocols and future directions.

show abstract

“…However, because of the weak evidence supporting it, one can consider that the evidence should be improved before systematically applying the procedures to the clinical reality. A very recent published systematic review () recommended against the systematic application of the socket‐shield technique; this recommendation was based on the current limitations of the evidence supporting the technique. The case of the buccal fat pad removal is even more dramatic, with patients being systematically treated without any published RCT on this topic.…”

Section: Are All Research Steps In Fact Necessary In the Translatiomentioning

confidence: 99%

The (in)adequacy of translational research in dentistry

Faggion

2020

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Translational research, as the name suggests, “translates” research findings into clinical practice to improve the health of human beings. The translational process builds on information from experiments conducted at a basic level (i.e., in vitro and/or animal studies) and progresses over experimental human studies for efficacy, efficiency, and safety to implementation. Therefore, all steps in the process should be based on studies conducted with the highest methodological quality possible in order to provide accurate and useful information. Furthermore, the systematic dissemination of new procedures/techniques should be done only when they have been proven to be effective and safe. This focus article describes examples of new techniques/procedures in dentistry that have not resulted from an adequate translational research process since the initial evidence was published. These procedures are generally characterised by lack of good evidence, particularly on their potential harms, and lack of adequate chronological order, regarding the translational research process (i.e., human research being conducted before animal research). Even so, they seem to be widely disseminated, and their promotion involves a wide range of sources, including social media. Some guidance is proposed to improve the quality of the translational research process in dentistry, as well as the level of awareness of all parties involved with the use of this research: clinicians, researchers, and patients. By improving the translational research process, optimization of the application and use of these resources, with less risk to the patients, is expected.

show abstract

Socket‐shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: A systematic review

Cited by 28 publications

References 33 publications

Socket shield: An esthetic success?

Socket shield: An esthetic success?

The Use of Autogenous Teeth for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Literature Review

The (in)adequacy of translational research in dentistry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About