2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sociophonetic variation and the lemma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…I discuss the results within the context of theories of identity construction and consider the possibility that colloquial words can serve as loci for socially-meaningful phonetic variation. The work presented in Chapter 3 can be found in article-form in Drager (2011a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I discuss the results within the context of theories of identity construction and consider the possibility that colloquial words can serve as loci for socially-meaningful phonetic variation. The work presented in Chapter 3 can be found in article-form in Drager (2011a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drager, 2011; Kohn and Farrington, 2012; Alam and Stuart-Smith, 2014; Li et al, 2016, among many others). This leads to potentially large pools of more or less fluent socially-motivated variation, as boys and girls negotiate gender-specific, group-specific, cohort-specific, or even clique-specific pronunciation habits that will continue to evolve even as they grow into adolescents who must further adjust their speech motor habits to the physiological changes to the vocal tract and glottis that are associated with hormonal changes at puberty.…”
Section: How and Why Standard Asr Methods Fail For Child Speechmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The fact that the different functions of like participate in different variable systems means that standard variationist methodology requires treating them separately. For instance, Ferrara & Bell (1995) state, in discussing the quotative like, that the discourse particle like belongs to "an altogether different variable" and therefore "is not the subject of this study" (emphasis theirs); D' Arcy (2005:29), in discussing the discourse particle, states that "quotative be like forms no part of this investigation". A typical variationist study of like is thus careful to circumscribe the variable context at issue, establish if possible which other variants compete with like in this particular variable context, and dismiss the other potential functions of like as not directly relevant to the constraints on variation affecting the like under discussion.…”
Section:  the Many Functions Of Likementioning
confidence: 99%