2018
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic status is inversely associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk: results from a population-based case-control study in China

Abstract: Socioeconomic status (SES) is suspected to influence the risk of esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China, however, the evidence is still inconclusive and the selection of SES indicators remains inconsistent. In current study, we examined the association between SES and risk of ESCC based on a population-based case-control study in Taixing, China, with 1298 histopathology-confirmed cases and 1900 controls recruited between October 2010 and September 2013. Data on SES indicators was collected using a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inverse dose-response association between risk of ESCC and socioeconomic status including educational level and annual income was reported previously (12). However, such statistical significance was not observed in our adjusted results of socioeconomic status, and age obviously affects the results of socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Sociodemographicscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Inverse dose-response association between risk of ESCC and socioeconomic status including educational level and annual income was reported previously (12). However, such statistical significance was not observed in our adjusted results of socioeconomic status, and age obviously affects the results of socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Sociodemographicscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The relationships between all identified environmental risk factors and ESCC risk have been well discussed in our previous articles [15,[17][18][19][20][21]. Although several predictive variables may not directly cause ESCC, they might be surrogate variables and their predictive values are notable [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The male and female adult height were converted into four categories according to the published nonlinear relationship (male cutoff values:162, 170 and 174; female cutoff values:152, 156 and 160, respectively, unit: centimeter) [21]. Family wealth score was calculated based on the ownership of valuable home items using a multiple correspondence analysis, and was further categorized as approximate quintiles among control participants [19]. The cumulative missing and filled teeth number, smoking packyears and daily intensity of alcohol drinking among the exposed were categorized by the median.…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wealth score was calculated on the basis of ownership of a series of household appliances, including a car, television, and washing machine, as well as on the basis of other variables, such as size of house area per person, by using a multiple correspondence analysis. 20 These scores were categorized by quantiles of observed coordinates in the correspondence analysis among the controls. The confounders were factors with crude significant association with ESCC (see Supplementary Table 2), as well as conventional confounders observed in the literature, such as age and sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%