2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic status and neural processing of a go/no-go task in preschoolers: An assessment of the P3b

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
17
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, habituation effects modulated P3 amplitude in the high-SES sample but not the low-SES sample. Similarly, St. John et al ( 2019 ) found that high-SES children at 4.5 to 5.5 years-old show increased P3 amplitudes compared to their low-SES counterparts using a go/no-go task. It is also important to know that Wang and Yang ( 2020 ) and Katus et al ( 2020 ) have examined the P3 from frontal sites and St John has obtained effects in posterior sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, habituation effects modulated P3 amplitude in the high-SES sample but not the low-SES sample. Similarly, St. John et al ( 2019 ) found that high-SES children at 4.5 to 5.5 years-old show increased P3 amplitudes compared to their low-SES counterparts using a go/no-go task. It is also important to know that Wang and Yang ( 2020 ) and Katus et al ( 2020 ) have examined the P3 from frontal sites and St John has obtained effects in posterior sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, results involving the P3 ERP do not suggest any systematic task-related effects on the relationship between SES and ERP amplitudes. Specifically, similar SES effects on the P3 are observed when attentional tasks of different modalities were used (Katus et al, 2020 ; Wang and Yang, 2020 ) and differences in SES effects on the P3 were found when tasks tapping similar processes are used (Ruberry et al, 2017 ; St. John et al, 2019 ). Overall, this systematic review is unable to establish with certainty whether there are effects of behavioral task differences on the SES-ERP relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study demonstrated left lateralisation of frontal negativity in both Go and No-Go trials [ 43 ] and another reported that relative to Go trials, No-Go trials elicited longer N2 latencies [ 43 , 44 ]. NoGo trials also elicited larger negative (N2) and positive (P3b) amplitudes compared to Go trials [ 43 , 45 , 47 ]. A study used source localisation analytic techniques to demonstrate an asymmetrical pattern of scalp lateralization of N2: right-lateralized in No-go trials and left-lateralized in Go trials [ 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on adolescents and adults show that lower P3 amplitudes in the oddball tasks are associated with poorer attentional focusing (Määttä et al., 2005) and higher risk for externalizing disorders (Patrick et al., 2006). The P3 component is sensitive to socioeconomic status: lower household income is related to the P3 amplitude reduction to both go and no‐go stimuli in preschoolers (St. John, Finch, & Tarullo, 2019). This finding in the current study might suggest the overall attentional difficulties in adults with an IC history.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%