2002
DOI: 10.4314/acsj.v10i1.27561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic factors associated with finger millet production in eastern Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with earlier studies carried out by Okwadi (2007), Kidoido et al (2002), and Tenywa et al (1999), in which farmers had earlier on pointed out labour costs as a major constraint to finger millet production. This mainly occurred because of the finger millet seed size which required very fine seedbed, and with over 95% of the farmers planting through broadcasting, it makes weeding and harvesting difficult.…”
Section: Finger Millet Production Constraints In Selected Districts Osupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is consistent with earlier studies carried out by Okwadi (2007), Kidoido et al (2002), and Tenywa et al (1999), in which farmers had earlier on pointed out labour costs as a major constraint to finger millet production. This mainly occurred because of the finger millet seed size which required very fine seedbed, and with over 95% of the farmers planting through broadcasting, it makes weeding and harvesting difficult.…”
Section: Finger Millet Production Constraints In Selected Districts Osupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Participatory rural appraisal has been previously conducted on finger millet in Uganda (Okwadi, 2007;Kidoido et al, 2002;Tenywa et al, 1999) none of the reports however, pointed to specific farmer preferences in a blast resistant, high yielding finger millet variety. The use of blast resistant finger millet cultivars therefore, might be the most effective blast control measure to the small-scale farmers in marginal areas since it is compatible with their low-input farming practices.…”
Section: Participatory Rural Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the 1960s, the dominant annual cropping systems were cotton-millet (Parsons 1970) but these have been overtaken in importance by cassava from the mid 1990s. Widespread soil degradation (Wortmann and Kaizzi 1998; Walaga et al 2000; Nkonya et al 2005), wetland encroachment (NEMA 2001) and low crop productivity in the system (Kidoido et al 2002) are reported. Livelihoods of the smallholders are threatened and recurrent episodes of famine have occurred (Ssali et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%