Socioeconomic constraints on the technological choices in rural sewage treatment

Abstract

Technological innovation is one of the potential engines to mitigate environmental pollution. However, the implementation of new technologies sometimes fails owing to socioeconomic constraints from different stakeholders. Thus, it is essential to analyze constraints of environmental technologies in order to build a pathway for their implementation. In this study, taking three technologies on rural sewage treatment in Hangzhou, China as a case study, i.e., wastewater treatment plant (WTP), constructed wetland (CW), and biogas system, we analyzed how socioeconomic constraints affect the technological choices. Results showed that socioeconomic constraints play a key role through changing the relative opportunity cost of inputs from government as compared to that of residents to deliver the public good-sewage treatment-under different economic levels. Economic level determines the technological choice, and the preferred sewage treatment technologies change from biogas system to CW and further to WTP along with the increase of economic level. Mismatch of technological choice and economic level results in failures of rural sewage treatment, e.g., the CW only work well in moderately developed regions in Hangzhou. This finding expands the environmental Kuznets law by introducing the coproduction theory into analysis (i.e., inputs from both government and residents are essential for the delivery of public goods and services such as good environmental quality). A match between technology and socioeconomic conditions is essential to the environmental governance.

PM2.5 pollution is substantially affected by ammonia emissions in China

“…In order to allow for new technologies to be introduced, some socioeconomic barriers need to be addressed (Gu et al, 2016), such as the fragmentation of Chinese croplands under the household contract responsibility system (Zhang et al, 2013b).…”

Effect of Dilution on the Pollutant Monitoring in Decentralised Treatment Facilities Using Electrical Conductivity Sensors: Experimental and Modelling Insights

“…Domestic sewage in rural areas is an important part of nonpoint source pollution; its direct discharge into surface waters without efficient treatment has caused declining water quality in aquatic environments and threatened the safety of drinking water in rural areas (Dubber and Gill 2017;Gu et al 2016;Murphy et al 2020;Nsenga Kumwimba et al 2018;Sorensen et al 2016). Treating decentralised domestic sewage is an increasing and difficult challenge in numerous developing countries (Lam et al 2015;Li et al 2020).…”

Efficiency assessment of rural domestic sewage treatment facilities by a slacked-based DEA model

“…Due to economic and geographical factors, the coverage of treatment facilities is extremely low in most rural areas of China. % of rural villages cannot effectively treat sewage (Gu et al, 2016). To control water pollution in rural areas, the central government had proposed an ambitious plan, that the treatment coverage in rural area will reach 33.6% by 2020.…”