2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioeconomic consequences of natural disasters on gender relations: The case of Haiti

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the estimation of the effect of the earthquakes in the Dominican Republic (2003( ), Honduras (2007( and 2009 and Haiti (2010) The results of our study reveal, in line with earlier scientific evidence, that the earthquakes that occurred in the Dominican Republic (2003( ), Honduras (2007( and 2010 and Haiti (2010) have had a negative impact on the wealth factor of households headed by women, in urban areas as well as rural areas (Gray 1993;Enarson et al 2006;Zottarelli 2008;Horton 2012;Bradshaw and Fordham 2013;Llorente-Marrón et al 2020a;Lebni et al 2020). Furthermore, it is of particular note that, in rural areas, the sign of the effect that the disaster had on household wealth with respect to the gender of the head of the household changed from the predisaster period to the postdisaster.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of the estimation of the effect of the earthquakes in the Dominican Republic (2003( ), Honduras (2007( and 2009 and Haiti (2010) The results of our study reveal, in line with earlier scientific evidence, that the earthquakes that occurred in the Dominican Republic (2003( ), Honduras (2007( and 2010 and Haiti (2010) have had a negative impact on the wealth factor of households headed by women, in urban areas as well as rural areas (Gray 1993;Enarson et al 2006;Zottarelli 2008;Horton 2012;Bradshaw and Fordham 2013;Llorente-Marrón et al 2020a;Lebni et al 2020). Furthermore, it is of particular note that, in rural areas, the sign of the effect that the disaster had on household wealth with respect to the gender of the head of the household changed from the predisaster period to the postdisaster.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…An example of this is the fact that after the earthquakes in Mexico in 1985 and El Salvador in 2001, women at the lower end of the socioeconomic scale had to deal not only with the destruction of their homes, but also the loss of their livelihood: for many of them, their home was not only the place where they lived, but also their work space as it was where they carried out informal work, principally related to caring for dependents, preparing food and washing clothes (Dufka 1988;Arenas Ferriz 2001). More recently, Llorente-Marrón et al (2020a) analysed the socioeconomic impact of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti on gender relations, observing that gender inequality not only persisted, but also widened after the disaster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased mortality was also observable in elderly males and male children, although in less extreme ways. To explain the increase in female mortality, insights might be gained from recent studies on catastrophic events in rural areas in underdeveloped countries where disasters have an emphatic effect on existing discriminatory patterns, exacerbate challenges people have accessing and managing resources (Llorente‐Marrón et al, 2020), and result in increased instances of violence against women (le Masson et al, 2016; Parkinson & Zara, 2013; Rao, 2020). These patterns existed in Spanish rural environments well into the twentieth century (García Martínez, 1990; Menéndez González, 2006; Pérez Álvarez, 2014), including in relation to female infanticide: Until the first half of the twentieth century, families resorted to this practice to shift sexual composition of their offspring and justified a preference towards sons on the grounds that, in the event of resource shortages, they could migrate out and send back remittances and could labour in more occupations in any case (Beltrán Tapia & Gallego‐Martínez, 2020; Echavarri, 2021; Marco‐Gracia & Beltrán Tapia, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, substantial advances have been made that point to the greater vulnerability of women, which is reflected in their higher levels of mortality in certain disasters and the worse effect on their health (Oxfam International 2005;Akerkar 2007;Bradshaw and Fordham 2013). The data also indicate that following a disaster, there is an increase in violence against women (Fisher 2010;Seager 2014), as well as a widening of economic inequality (Wiest et al 1995;Bradshaw and Fordham 2013;Llorente-Marrón et al 2020a) and a rise in women's social vulnerability (Llorente-Marrón et al 2020b). Specifically, research suggests that in dealing with these situations, pre-existing gender inequalities are evident in all dimensions and phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%