Handbook of Personality at Work
DOI: 10.4324/9780203526910.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socioanalytic Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
236
0
4

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
236
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These two factors may be aligned with some of the other sets of dual personological constructs reviewed by Digman (1997) and by Paulhus and John (1998), including Hogan's (1983) distinction between "getting ahead" (Dynamism; D) and "getting along" (Social Propriety; S). This constellation of two factors is also related to the three most ubiquitous dimensions of affective meaning, which include Potency (or Strength) and Activity in addition to Evaluation (Osgood et al, 1975); Osgood et al (1975) indicated that in judgments of human targets Potency and Activity often combine in a blend they called Dynamism.…”
Section: The Big Five and Alternative Modelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These two factors may be aligned with some of the other sets of dual personological constructs reviewed by Digman (1997) and by Paulhus and John (1998), including Hogan's (1983) distinction between "getting ahead" (Dynamism; D) and "getting along" (Social Propriety; S). This constellation of two factors is also related to the three most ubiquitous dimensions of affective meaning, which include Potency (or Strength) and Activity in addition to Evaluation (Osgood et al, 1975); Osgood et al (1975) indicated that in judgments of human targets Potency and Activity often combine in a blend they called Dynamism.…”
Section: The Big Five and Alternative Modelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The need for predictability and uncertainty reduction is possibly innate, which leads to the idea that uncertainty avoidance is fundamental in any social sphere (Hogan, 1983). Fairness information is an environmental cue that can help reduce uncertainty because it either increases or decreases employees' fears of being exploited in a social exchange .…”
Section: Umtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acquaintance judgments are important to examine because a person's reputation can be defined as the sum total of judgments made of him or her by others (Funder, 1999;Hogan, 1982). The way others perceive a particular person (e.g., as friendly or unfriendly) greatly influences important social outcomes for him or her (e.g., being embraced or avoided by others).…”
Section: Acquaintance and Clinician Ratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%