2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond self-report in the study of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: Correlations with acquaintance reports, clinician judgments and directly observed social behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because both personality traits and parenting stress inherently refer to perceptions and experiences that an individual has in relation to the self, they are also difficult to measure through any method other than self-reports, and it is not evident that other informants' (e.g., spouses, children) evaluations of the respondent's personality traits or level of parenting stress are any more reliable than self-reports. There is evidence to suggest that there is a considerable overlap in individuals' self-assessment of their well-being and behavior and the assessments of acquaintances and clinicians as well as assessments based on direct observations of social behaviors (Nave, Sherman, & Funder, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because both personality traits and parenting stress inherently refer to perceptions and experiences that an individual has in relation to the self, they are also difficult to measure through any method other than self-reports, and it is not evident that other informants' (e.g., spouses, children) evaluations of the respondent's personality traits or level of parenting stress are any more reliable than self-reports. There is evidence to suggest that there is a considerable overlap in individuals' self-assessment of their well-being and behavior and the assessments of acquaintances and clinicians as well as assessments based on direct observations of social behaviors (Nave, Sherman, & Funder, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After reverse scoring negatively phrased items, a single composite score was calculated by taking the mean across all subscales. Past research has found that the SPWB scores demonstrate internal consistency reliability, factorial validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity (Nave, Sherman, & Funder, 2008;Ryff, 1989;Ryff & Keyes, 1995). The scale has demonstrated broad applicability in terms of use with samples of various ages (Nave et al, 2008;Ryff, 1989), as well as an athlete sample (Edwards & Steyn, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with recent findings that different components of well-being tend to be indistinguishable in empirical research (Kashdan, Biswas-Diener, & King, 2008;Nave, Sherman, & Funder, 2008), and that they show highly consistent associations with expressive accuracy (Human & Biesanz, 2011b), we examined a standardized composite adjustment measure (α = .68) for ease of presentation. The composite adjustment measure was computed by standardizing each individual measure, averaging the three scales together and standardizing that composite scale.…”
Section: Psychological Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%