2019
DOI: 10.1177/0308518x19845142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-spatial dimensions in energy transitions: Applying the TPSN framework to case studies in Germany

Abstract: Energy transitions cannot be fully grasped without appreciating their spatial implications. This paper takes up the idea of conceptualizing the socio-spatial dimensions of energy transitions and examines the respective value of the Territory, Place, Scale, and Network (TPSN) framework. The fundamental contribution of this framework is to move the focus of the debate away from whether one ontology of the socio-spatial is ‘better’ than another. By applying the TPSN framework to emblematic cases of regional energ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to provide a framework that encourages explorative studies the four provided dimensions are only briefly introduced but not defined by the authors into detail (Gailing et al . 2019). This creates a site for criticism as it disregards other important spatial categories (Paasi & Metzger 2017).…”
Section: Theorising the Spread: The Covid‐19 Outbreak As A Spatial Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to provide a framework that encourages explorative studies the four provided dimensions are only briefly introduced but not defined by the authors into detail (Gailing et al . 2019). This creates a site for criticism as it disregards other important spatial categories (Paasi & Metzger 2017).…”
Section: Theorising the Spread: The Covid‐19 Outbreak As A Spatial Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ways in which social actors combine and prioritise those four socio‐spatial dimensions can be seen as different strategies for political intervention and the exercise of power (Jones 2019). Of course, these combinations and interrelationships are not consistent, but rather are intrinsically contradictory and conflictual (Gailing et al 2019).…”
Section: Worker Centre Strategy Spatiality and The Geography Of Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their original formulation, Jessop et al (2008) provided an open definition of the categories of territory, place, scale and network, recognising that these dimensions appear entangled in reality and can only be separated for heuristic purposes. According to Gailing et al (2019), their open proposal has undergone some criticisms, such as the ones of Mayer (2008), who highlights that it underestimates the role of actors and interests; and Paasi and Metzger (2017), who point out that they exclude other spatial categories such as regions or landscapes. The formulation of Jessop et al (2008) should be understood more as a general defence for the employment of a multi‐categorical approach and the formulation of explanatory metaphors able to encompass spatial multi‐dimensionality than as a closed theoretical schema with fixed analytical categories.…”
Section: Worker Centre Strategy Spatiality and The Geography Of Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second area of engagement for the dissertation relates to the absence of geography in studies of transformation processes (Bridge et al, 2013, Calvert et al, 2017, Kebir et al, 2017, Gailing et al, 2019, Capasso et al, 2019, Hansen and Coenen, 2015.…”
Section: Motivation For the Dissertation And Problem Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%