2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-004-6255-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic factors and breast cancer survival – a population-based cohort study (Sweden)

Abstract: These results show that socio-economic disparities in breast cancer survival prevail even in this relatively homogenous society, offering outreach mammography and standardised treatment regimens in a tax-funded health care system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
3
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
69
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the number of children was also associated with age at diagnosis: women below 70 at diagnosis were more likely to have two or more children compared with those diagnosed at an older age. In our study, the socio-economic variable 'occupational' was an independent prognostic factor of stage at diagnosis and of overall survival: the higher the occupational status, the better the stage and the longer the survival, as found in other studies (Thomson et al, 2001;Cross et al, 2002;Taylor and Cheng, 2003;Lagerlund et al, 2005;Downing et al, 2007). In France, it is difficult to obtain individual socio-economic data and to make comparisons with other varied studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Finally, the number of children was also associated with age at diagnosis: women below 70 at diagnosis were more likely to have two or more children compared with those diagnosed at an older age. In our study, the socio-economic variable 'occupational' was an independent prognostic factor of stage at diagnosis and of overall survival: the higher the occupational status, the better the stage and the longer the survival, as found in other studies (Thomson et al, 2001;Cross et al, 2002;Taylor and Cheng, 2003;Lagerlund et al, 2005;Downing et al, 2007). In France, it is difficult to obtain individual socio-economic data and to make comparisons with other varied studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Baixa condição socioeconômica interfere no acesso a serviços de prevenção, rastreamento regular, diagnósti-co e tratamento oportunos 27,28 ; por outro lado, mulheres com alto nível socioeconômico apresentam melhor prognóstico ao diagnóstico de câncer de mama 29 . Dessa forma, a relação entre nível socioeconômico e prognóstico do câncer de mama e colo do útero pode ser justificada pelo diagnóstico realizado em fase avançada da doença, em virtude da dificuldade de acesso aos programas de prevenção e aos cuidados médicos nas classes sociais menos favorecidas, mesmo em países desenvolvidos 28 .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Study subjects were also followed until the end of follow-up, emigration, or deathas provided through linkage with the Swedish Emigration Register and the Cause of Death Register (Lagerlund et al 2005)-whichever occurred first. Furthermore, patients were censored at the time of admission to hospital if they underwent reoperation due to prosthesis-related complications.…”
Section: Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%