2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic characteristics and the effect of taxation as a health policy instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
137
1
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
3
137
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Providing nutritional information (e.g. menu labelling) seems to have limited impact on food choices [2,3,15,[19][20][21][22][23], as do politically feasible food tax reforms [5][6][7][8]24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Providing nutritional information (e.g. menu labelling) seems to have limited impact on food choices [2,3,15,[19][20][21][22][23], as do politically feasible food tax reforms [5][6][7][8]24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4]). Further, research on the impact of food tax reforms implies that taxes of the magnitudes that are politically feasible are likely to have little impact on food consumption (e.g., [5][6][7][8]). In essence, information and moderate price incentives do not seem to substantially impact healthier food consumption 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a public health nutrition perspective, regressivity is a concern because of the negative effect of poverty on health overall (81) . However, the extent of regressivity created by public health nutrition taxation is not clear, and some studies have suggested that the poor may in fact benefit disproportionately from the health benefits resulting from economic incentives to improve diet (16,62,69) . In terms of the differential effects on consumption, Brownell et al (58) point out that in the USA both the 15-20 % drop in soft drink consumption and any associated increase in expenditure that would most likely result from a small tax is relatively minor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on unhealthy foods) (44) Contrary to trade liberalisation agenda Feasible if non-discriminatory and within bound rates Use of existing tariff bands will improve feasibility and acceptability Decrease tariffs (e.g. on healthy foods) (19) In line with WTO recommendations Feasible -aligns to trade liberalisation agenda More likely if existing tariff bands are used Revenue-neutral tax plus subsidy or tax Adds administrative complexity Unlikely -adds to administrative burden reduction (42,47,69) More likely if existing types and rates of taxes are used Variable taxes based on price change Adds administrative complexity Unlikely -adds to administrative burden required for dietary change (48) More likely if existing types and rates of taxes are used VAT, value-added tax; GST, goods and services tax; WTO, World Trade Organization.…”
Section: Critical Assessment Of Recommendations For Nutrition Taxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…different household types. Smed et al (2007) analyze the impact of tax reforms on the intake of fiber, saturated fat, and sugar across age and income groups. They find that young households have a higher elasticity of demand for saturated fat, whereas middle-aged households have a higher elasticity of demand for sugar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%