2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0165-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socially Strategic Ecological Restoration: A Game-Theoretic Analysis Shortened: Socially Strategic Restoration

Abstract: Major transitions in a multiple-use or mosaic landscape often lead to frictions among new and existing users. In this article, we consider the problem of ecological restoration within a mosaic landscape in which restoration activities elicit feedbacks from individuals and groups that are harmed by restoration outcomes. Using game theory, we identify three potential outcomes ranked by the extent of restoration of ecosystem services and processes: nonstrategic, noncooperative strategic equilibrium, and cooperati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Habitat restoration may attempt to manage particular multi-species interactions, or may seek to promote growth of many threatened species [1]. Our cost function ignores feedback of a species' restoration on other biotic processes, or on economic stake-holders who incur post-restoration costs [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat restoration may attempt to manage particular multi-species interactions, or may seek to promote growth of many threatened species [1]. Our cost function ignores feedback of a species' restoration on other biotic processes, or on economic stake-holders who incur post-restoration costs [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations argue for a radical re-thinking in broad-scale, land-use management in much of southern Australia, one that accounts for the multiple objectives of economic productivity, social cohesion and environmental condition (Hobbs and Lambeck, 2002;Buckley and Haddad, 2006). The state of biodiversity contributions to such multi-purpose planning is relatively rudimentary (Veldkamp and Verburg, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The use of this approach for solving problems of postmining area restoration has not been tested, but similar applications are available for optimization of the landscape structure. These include restoration solutions in multipurpose landscapes (Buckley & Haddad, 2006), multicriteria optimization in landscapes (Grabaum & Meyer, 1998), linear landscape element optimization (Meyer et al, 2012), design and zoning of protected areas (Busch, 2008; Lin & Li, 2016), and addressing problems of urban landscape design (Tan et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2020). Application of a genetics‐inspired algorithm and game theory model of land‐use spatial optimization with competitions between different land use types was proposed by Liu et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%