2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lag dæmon: Hysteresis in rebuilding landscapes and implications for biodiversity futures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Revegetation in fertile areas offers multiple benefits. Tree growth rates will be faster than on poor soils (Mac Nally, 2008) and warm-season flowering of eucalypts associated with these sites (e.g. yellow box Eucalyptus melliodora, river red gum Eucalyptus camaldulensis) will increase the temporal complementarity of nectar resources across the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revegetation in fertile areas offers multiple benefits. Tree growth rates will be faster than on poor soils (Mac Nally, 2008) and warm-season flowering of eucalypts associated with these sites (e.g. yellow box Eucalyptus melliodora, river red gum Eucalyptus camaldulensis) will increase the temporal complementarity of nectar resources across the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of loss of habitat, the MLR has lost, and is expected to continue to lose, a significant proportion of its avifauna (Ford and Howe 1980;Ford et al 2001;Possingham and Field 2001). Although there has been increasing effort at revegetation and restoration, the extent and condition of habitat may not have yet stabilised (Vesk and Mac Nally 2006;Mac Nally 2008). There is often a time-lag between habitat degradation or clearance and local avian extinction (Martin and McIntyre 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restoration planning poses a similar challenge to systematic planning for reserve selection (Margules and Pressey 2000, Cabeza and Moilanen 2001, Pressey et al 2007, Wilson et al 2007) because sites are chosen to maximize one or more biodiversity objectives (or objective functions), such as abundance or persistence of multiple species across landscapes (Moilanen et al 2005, Nicholson et al 2006, Mac Nally 2008). An important difference is that restoration planning must consider locations that currently do not provide habitat (e.g., cleared land) but would do so in the future given sufficient and timely actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%