Socially fair domestic water pricing: who is going to pay for the non-revenue water?

Abstract

To plan and develop a socially fair water pricing policy is a difficult task to do since many factors need to be taken into consideration. Usually, a significant part of a water tariff structure is the fixed charge that should be associated to the opportunity cost the consumers have to pay. In many cases though, it is set just to balance the water utility's revenues and expenses. This weird billing practice results in the underestimation of the Non-Revenue Water (NRW) and in the minimization of water use efficiency. The application of the IWA Standard International Water Balance 2nd modification and its element, the Minimum Charge Difference (MCD) can reveal how big this "underestimation" is. MCD represents the water volume that although not consumed, generates revenues to the water utility. Another element towards a socially fair pricing policy is the allocation of the NRW-related cost. In every water network, two main water users are identified: the actual water consumers and the network itself due to the real water losses occurring. The paper presents a novel methodology to estimate the MCD and a new approach regarding a socially fair allocation of the NRW-related cost.

Optimizing Re-Chlorination Injection Points for Water Supply Networks Using Harmony Search Algorithm

“…A water distribution network (WDN) is a critical civil infrastructure that supplies purified water to consumers. This purified water must be supplied in adequate quantities, at an adequate pressure, at an acceptable quality, and at affordable or socially fair prices that are based on the full water cost recovery principle [1,2]. When considering this, when an expanded water supply and a formation of district areas are required by a new town or large-scale residential complex construction, hydraulic and water quality modeling are essential to review the probability of a sufficient water supply and adequate residual chlorine.…”

Undermining European Environmental Policy Goals? The EU Water Framework Directive and the Politics of Exemptions

“…In fact, it mirrored deeper socio-political discrepancies between member states and with the Commission. Affordability, because of its focus on distribution issues and financial impacts can be considered as a "social-minded" approach [61,62]. Conventional CBAs instead focus on efficiency, on maximising human welfare, and although distribution effects can be theoretically incorporated [63], analysis of affordability does not enter the equation [26].…”

The Impact of Pricing Policies on Irrigation Water for Agro-Food Farms in Ecuador

“…On the other hand, fixed costs are the most widespread price structure to recover partial costs of maintenance and operation [34]. In fact, Kanakoudis [35] explains how, through the assessment of tariffs on residential water consumption in Greece, fixed rates do not represent the opportunity costs with which consumer behavior is affected. These costs are not fair to consumers and they serve to cover only part of the operational costs of the system.…”