Undermining European Environmental Policy Goals? The EU Water Framework Directive and the Politics of Exemptions

Abstract

Abstract:The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is the core legislative instrument in the European Union for the protection of water resources. Adopted in 2000, its objectives were to achieve "good status" for water bodies by 2015 and prevent any further deterioration. However, the European Commission and some stakeholders are rather dissatisfied with the implementation of the Directive so far, in particular with the use of exemptions to the environmental objectives. Exemptions are of paramount importance: they may constitute a significant obstacle to the achievement of the WFD's objectives as they enable member states to lower the ambition of the Directive and to delay the achievement of good status, thereby undermining the environmental goal of the WFD. Critical voices observe an excessive reliance on exemptions, poor justifications, and great variations in their use. Based on an analysis of 120 policy documents and 15 semi-structured interviews, this article provides explanations for the politics of exemptions in EU water management. It shows that different viewpoints and interpretations on the WFD's objectives and exemptions were already present in the negotiation phase of the Directive, but remained undefined on purpose. Moreover, dysfunctional decision-making procedures in the Common Implementation Strategy and the lack of political support in WFD implementation were significant obstacles to an agreement on this important issue. Finally, decisions on WFD implementation in member states were often driven by pragmatism. The article explains how the negotiations of the WFD and the EU-level discussion on the implementation of the Directive undermined environmental goals in EU governance; its findings are also relevant for policy fields other than water.

Seasonal Trends of Atmospheric PAHs in Five Asian Megacities and Source Detection Using Suitable Biomarkers

“…One obvious effect is the proliferation of hazardous materials, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), in the atmosphere. PAHs cause great concern because of their mutagenic, carcinogenic, and teratogenic properties, and are designated as priority pollutants in the EU (IARC, 1983;Boeuf et al., 2016). They tend to be associated with particulate matter (PM), soils, and sediments (EEA, 2012;Cassee et al, 2013;Cheruiyot et al, 2015).…”

Stakeholder Engagement and Knowledge Co-Creation in Water Planning: Can Public Participation Increase Cost-Effectiveness?

“…Without this bridge between top-down and bottom-up policy framework, it is not certain that collaboration automatically leads to sustainable outcomes, because there can be vested interests that undermine the effectiveness of EU environmental policies [59]. However, at the same time, the design of the framework around the Danish water council set-up is also a limiting factor.…”

“…The proposed PoM was then forwarded to the Nature Agency as part of the preparations for the second round of RBMPs. In a recent publication, Boeuf et al [59] revealed the existence of several exemption clauses in WFD implementation across member states, which if overused, could undermine the environmental goals of the EU WFD. The fact that many actors-also in a Danish context-potentially could have an interest in undermining the effectiveness of EU environmental policies is not going to be the core aspect in the water council case.…”

The EU Water Initiative at 15: origins, processes and assessment

“…The WFD is arguably the most ambitious piece of EU legislation in the field of water. The directive defines a framework for IWRM in Europe with a view to achieving 'good water status' by 2015 (now extended to 2021) Boeuf, Fritsch, & Martin-Ortega, 2016). Institutional novelties include the management of water at hydrological scales, public participation, and the use of economic tools.…”