Social Support and Corruption: Structural Determinants of Corruption in the World

Abstract

Corruption is a growing global epidemic. Our understanding of its causes is limited. Combining data from several sources, the current article tests the validity of social support theory in explaining corruption in an integrated structural model. The findings support our theoretical speculation: our social support measure is a strong predictor of corruption in the model. In addition, undemocratic governments with inadequate checks and balances indirectly contribute to the high level of corruption in a nation. Democracy promotes human development and bolsters social support for citizens' wellbeing, both of which reduce the level of corruption in a nation. Inequality fosters corruption indirectly through reduced human development and reduced social support. We conclude that criminologists need not await the determinations of international legal systems to study scathing behavior, such as corruption.

A Partial Test of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime and Delinquency

“…LISREL uses maximum likelihood methods of estimation and evaluates the overall model by comparing the original and estimated covariance matrix (Hennessy, 1985;Zhang, Cao, & Vaughn, 2009). The initial structural model mirrors theoretical hypotheses as suggested by Agnew (2005, p. 180).…”

Corruption and development: a comparative approach to socioeconomic and political dimensions worldwide

“…The reaction to these factors determines the behavior of state bureaucracy (Lederman et al 2005). As a result, a highly developed and well-functioning democracy serves as a tool for increasing the level of overall development (Zhang et al 2009). Similarly to the vision of political science, the new wave of institutional economics argues that institutions play a decisive role in sustainable development and growth, ultimately claiming that democracy stimulates growth in a direct (or indirect) way (e.g.…”

Corruption in Nigeria: Theoretical Explanation

“…Meng and Friday (2010) called it -simultaneously economic, political, criminal and sociological in origin‖ (p. 1). Zhang, Cao, and Vaughn (2009) argued for criminological and criminal-justice-based research on corruption. They noted that despite the proliferation of studies on corruptio n most research on corruption comes from such disciplines as economics and political science.…”

“…From that perspective, they observed, corruption is seen as social and economic issue. Zhang et al (2009) charged that most researchers have failed to see corruption as an outcome rather than a cause and have not analyzed corruption in the light of criminological theory. Meng and Friday (2010) argued that since corruption is a criminal act, it demands an integrated theoretical approach that considers the prevailing criminal justice, economic, political, environment and social norms of a given society.…”