Social Responsibility and Loyalty in Public Relations Codes

Abstract

Background: It is believed that social responsibility, the value that is strongly involved in the contemporary corporate behaviour, has also become the core value for public relations practitioners and their associations. However, there are ethical doubts concerning the question to whom a PR practitioner is actually responsible (or loyal) in the first place: to the client, the employer, the public, or society in general?Objectives: This research aims to describe how social responsibility is articulated in the documents that can be considered as the crown of public relations ethics – the codes of ethics – and additionally, how the value of loyalty corresponds to the value of social responsibility.Methods/Approach: The research is based on the content analyses of 13 codes of ethics that are delivered by 18 public relations associations at the international and the national level in the USA and the European Union.Results: Although the phrase “social responsibility” is not mentioned in codes directly, the value of social responsibility is present in very diverse ways. When the value of loyalty came into the correlation with social responsibility, the research has shown that these values exist as a separate principle.Conclusions: The public relations are a profession that tends to be socially responsible and tends to show that loyalty to clients and organizations is subordinated to public and social responsibility. Thus, the codes show that contemporary public relations, at least at the normative level, approach the two-way symmetric model and mostly promote “idealistic social role” of public relations.

The Relation between Sustainable Development Trends and Customer Value Management

“…The role of corporate social responsibility goals in achieving sustainable development is also a critical issue for aligning businesses to this end [10]. Commitment of organization to contribute to sustainable economic development working with employees, their families, the local community, and society to improve their quality of life should be good for business and for development [11]. Corporate responsibility strategy is relevant for the successful business of modern organizations [12].…”

How does corporate social responsibility transform brand reputation into brand equity? Economic and noneconomic perspectives of CSR

“…Therefore, stakeholders of each global brand are affected by the management of their competitors. 1 –3 Corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be used as a competitive advantage for any brand. This social responsibility of an organization starts where law of the land ends.…”

Aspects Influencing Purchasing Decision, Based on Fashion Purchasing Attitudes

“…The role of corporate social responsibility goals in accomplishing sustainable development is also a serious issue for aligning businesses to this end (Kolk and Van Tulder, 2010). The obligation of organization to contribute to sustainable economic development, cooperation with employees, their families, the local community, and society to improve their quality of life or well-being should be worthy for business and for development (Kolić, Stanić, and Barišić, 2019). Corporate responsibility strategy is significant for the successful business of modern organizations (Vukić et al, 2020).…”