Social Reproduction and the Agrarian Question of Women’s Labour in India

Abstract

Using a social reproduction framework, this article explores how reproduction of rural working class households is rearticulated to capitalist production in India. Our analysis of the conditions in India reveals that the interaction of three institutions-market, state, and household-has imposed the burden of reproduction on women. In turn, women's work is dependent on private and common lands. This link, between the role of women's unpaid labour in reproducing rural households and the fact that this work remains largely dependent on land, constitutes a failure of the Indian economy to provide decent livelihoods. It also reasserts gender equity as a contemporary and unresolved question in the midst of India's agrarian transition and underscores the importance of instituting agrarian reforms and state intervention at levels sufficient for social reproduction.

Changing Forms of Wage Labour in Zimbabwe’s New Agrarian Structure

“…Patriarchal structures, which sideline women from active involvement in the full-time sections of the farm labour force it could be argued, have been resilient even in the context of land reform and women’s position in the labour markets therefore remains peripheral. Furthermore, women still remain burdened with the attending to their reproductive roles that might conflict with full-time farm labour employment (Naidu & Ossome, 2016; Tsikata, 2016).…”

The care economy and the state in Africa’s Covid-19 responses

“…That structure is of a semi-proletarianised labour force that retains a critical dependency on land and landed resources in the absence of a living wage. Studies show, however, that access to land does not necessarily support accumulation (due to the systematic suppression of accumulation from below), but merely offers a means to survival (Naidu and Ossome 2016). The contemporary significance of land is closely tied to the effect of capitalism's systemic crisis tendenciesat the core of which lies the question of social reproductionon the working people's ability to survive.…”

Naming matters: Inheritance, land, and reproductive labor in rural Tanzania

“…In recent years, economic and ecological crises have prompted a resurgence of work on social reproduction (Bhattacharya 2017; Cielo, Coba, and Vallejo 2016; Cousins et al. 2018; Fraser 2016; Naidu and Ossome 2016).…”

“…In agrarian contexts, the conflict between social reproduction and accumulation manifests in struggles over land and its uses (Cousins et al. 2018; Moyo 1995; Naidu and Ossome 2016). Whereas capitalism tends to render land as a productive resource, social reproduction relies on land in its multiplicity, as a locus for social relations, sacred geographies, and shared histories as well as a place to live and farm (Ferguson 2013; Li 2014).…”