1994
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Reinforcement of Operant Behavior in Rats: A Methodological Note

Abstract: An apparatus was developed to study social reinforcement in the rat. Four Long-Evans female rats were trained to press a lever via shaping, with the reinforcer being access to a castrated male rat. Responding under a fixed-ratio schedule and in extinction was also observed. Social access was found to be an effective reinforcer. When social reinforcement was compared with food reinforcement under similar conditions of deprivation and reinforcer duration, no significant differences were observed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(9 reference statements)
5
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study offers some support for a social-learning model in that the self-administration behavior of a peer, as opposed to merely the presence of a peer, determined the reinforcing strength of cocaine. Findings such as these are consistent with a large body of literature indicating that modeling and social reinforcement influence responding maintained by nondrug reinforcers (see Angermeier, 1960; Heyes et al, 1992; Evans et al, 1994; Akins and Zentall, 1996; Akins et al, 2002). These findings also extend those from several recent studies examining proximal social factors (i.e., those present at the time of testing) on measures of drug reinforcement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The present study offers some support for a social-learning model in that the self-administration behavior of a peer, as opposed to merely the presence of a peer, determined the reinforcing strength of cocaine. Findings such as these are consistent with a large body of literature indicating that modeling and social reinforcement influence responding maintained by nondrug reinforcers (see Angermeier, 1960; Heyes et al, 1992; Evans et al, 1994; Akins and Zentall, 1996; Akins et al, 2002). These findings also extend those from several recent studies examining proximal social factors (i.e., those present at the time of testing) on measures of drug reinforcement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Initiation of drug taking nearly always occurs in a social context in which peers provide social reward for the behavior, yet surprisingly little research has been conducted with animal models to investigate the influence of social interactions at the time of drug taking (i.e., social context). The presence of a nonthreatening conspecific is highly salient and rewarding, especially in adolescent rats (Vanderschuren et al, 1997;Spear, 2000); for instance, nonthreatening conspecifics 1) elicit approach (Panksepp et al, 1984), 2) elicit ultrasonic vocalizations thought to be indicative of positive affect (Burgdorf et al, 2008), 3) are positive reinforcers (Angermeier et al, 1959;Werner and Anderson, 1976;Evans et al, 1994), and 4) produce CPP (Calcagnetti and Schechter, 1992;Crowder and Hutto, 1992;Douglas et al, 2004). Research examining drug effects in a social context suggests that this is an important variable that influences sensitivity to the rewarding effects of drugs.…”
Section: Psychosocial Influences and Abused Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects are observed even if responding produces only the visual stimulus of another rat and physical contact is prevented, suggesting that the mere presence of another animal is sufficient to produce reinforcing effects. Moreover, when the reinforcing effects of social contact are compared with the reinforcing effects of food, no significant differences are observed if the stimuli are tested under similar conditions of deprivation and reinforcer duration (Evans et al, 1994). Thus, if participation within a group is contingent on using a drug, then the social contact provided by that group may be sufficient to maintain drug use as long as the group remains functionally intact.…”
Section: Behavioral Mechanisms Controlling Drug Intakementioning
confidence: 99%