2013
DOI: 10.1124/pr.111.005124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Differences and Social Influences on the Neurobehavioral Pharmacology of Abused Drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
106
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 513 publications
4
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The neurobiological mechanisms responsible for the effects of social learning on drug selfadministration are not known, but candidate systems are those that process information regarding both drug and social stimuli (see reviews by Bardo et al, 2013;Burkett and Young, 2012;McGregor and Bowen, 2012). For instance, the amygdaloid complex plays a critical role in the assimilation of interoceptive (i.e., drug effects) and exteroceptive (i.e., social environment) stimuli and may serve as a locus of integration for drug and social reinforcement (Badiani, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neurobiological mechanisms responsible for the effects of social learning on drug selfadministration are not known, but candidate systems are those that process information regarding both drug and social stimuli (see reviews by Bardo et al, 2013;Burkett and Young, 2012;McGregor and Bowen, 2012). For instance, the amygdaloid complex plays a critical role in the assimilation of interoceptive (i.e., drug effects) and exteroceptive (i.e., social environment) stimuli and may serve as a locus of integration for drug and social reinforcement (Badiani, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a fierce debate on this point has been reported in the literature (Diana, 2011;Levy, 2013). Without minimizing the obvious role of the degree, amount, and duration of drug exposure and the roles of genetics (Crabbe, Phillips, & Belknap, 2010;Moeller et al, 2013), environmental/developmental factors (Bardo, Neisewander, & Kelly, 2013;Doremus-Fitwater, Varlinskaya, & Spear, 2010), and Bgene-to-environmentî nteractions (Cabib, Orsini, Le Moal, & Piazza, 2000;Caspi & Moffitt, 2006), most recent frameworks basically suggest that individual vulnerabilities to substances of abuse may also be related to underlying neuro biological factors (George, Koob, & Vendruscolo, 2014;Piazza & Deroche-Gamonet, 2013;Volkow, Wang, Fowler, & Tomasi, 2012; for a critical debate, see also the comments in Psychopharmacology, 231(19), 2014). Although the distinction between nonpathological and pathological drug users based on behavioral symptoms is a matter of debate, anecdotal and scientific reports agree on the idea that drug use does not necessarily result in drug abuse and drug dependence; rather it has been hypothesized that drug use is on a continuum that can lead to drug addiction (Koob et al, 2004).…”
Section: Motor Cognition In Asd: Motor Anomalies Impacting On Social mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little is known about the effects of environmental variables on specific D2-like receptor subtypes; it may be that the environmental variables associates with the social hierarchy differentially affect D 2 , D 3 , and D 4 receptors. Considering the well-documented ability of environmentally derived stress and enrichment to modulate cocaine self-administration (see, eg, Nader et al, 2012a;Bardo et al, 2013) the effects of environmental variables on D 3 and D 4 receptors warrant further study.…”
Section: Influence Of Social Rank On the Effects Of Buspironementioning
confidence: 99%