Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication.

Abstract

Computer-mediated communication was once confined to technical users and was considered somewhat arcane. This no longer holds true. Computer-mediated communication is a key component of the emerging technology of computer networks. In networks, people can exchange, store, edit, broadcast, and copy any written document. They can send data and messages instantaneously, easily, at low cost, and over long distances. Two or more people can look at a document and revise it together, consult with each other on critical matters without meeting together or setting up a telephone conference, or ask for and give assistance interactively (Hiltz & Turoff, 1978; Williams, 1977). Networks, and hence computer-mediated communications, are proliferating at a tremendous rate. In addition to the older long-distance networks that connect thousands of scientists, professionals, and managers (e.g., the Department of Defense's ARPA-NET, GTE's TELENET), there are more and more local-area networks that link up computers within a region, city, or organization (e.g., Nestar System's CLUSTERBUS, Xerox's ETHERNET, Ford Aerospace's FLASHNET, and Wang Laboratories' WANGNET). Stimulating this growth are the decreasing costs and the advantages of networks over stand-alone systems, such as sharing high-speed printers and access to a common interface for otherwise incompatible equipment. The future of this technology cannot be foretold, but it is far from arcane. The functions and impact of computer-mediated communication are still poorly understood. Critical information (such as who uses it for what purposes)

Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions

“…Owing to its comparative poverty in terms of interpersonal cues and felt social "presence," computer-mediated communication generally appears to reduce social status differences and group hierarchies that emerge in face-to-face groups (Williams 1977). Online formats may be less than ideally suited to developing relationships and getting to know others (Kiesler, Siegel, and McGuire 1984;Rice 1993). At the same time, Walther (1992) has argued, and offered evidence in support of his contention, that people quite successfully adapt computer-mediated communication to their social purposes.…”

An nD modelling approach to improve communication processes for construction

“…In their classic paper, Kiesler et al (1984) argued that although "no one can predict in any detail the nature of the transformations that computers will bring...one aspect of life that will certainly be affected is communication." Even in the early 1980s, it was observed that communication tools such as e-mail, bulletin boards and simultaneous computer conferences were advancing, in the words of Stockton (1981), "like an avalanche."…”

A Qualitative Study of Insults in Collaborative Learning

“…Moreover, sociolinguistics has investigated the effect of aspects of various cultural norms on social behavior (e.g., gender, age, socioeconomic classes, religion, and education; [12]). In the background, the norms communication success (unambiguous) depends on the efficiency of the transmission of the communication channel [13], [14], the sender's intention, the receiver's interpretation, and the message (un)ambiguity [15].…”