Living Labs 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Practices as a Main Focus in Living Lab Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of living labs was also presented as a socio-technical infrastructure to support user-centric and often open innovation processes [28,31,33]. According to Romero Herrera, such labs deliver collaborative platforms for professionals from different disciplines to work together with future users and public and private stakeholders to generate solutions that are rooted in the settings of daily life practices.…”
Section: Living Labsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of living labs was also presented as a socio-technical infrastructure to support user-centric and often open innovation processes [28,31,33]. According to Romero Herrera, such labs deliver collaborative platforms for professionals from different disciplines to work together with future users and public and private stakeholders to generate solutions that are rooted in the settings of daily life practices.…”
Section: Living Labsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, innovation has more than only a technological aspect: it extends to socio-economic-environmental and political scopes [35] (p. 1). Even further, the needs created by the technologies themselves and social practices surrounding them should be taken into account or the outcomes of new sustainable approaches, practices, technologies can turn out very unsustainable [36] (p. 24). Living Labs projects can help establish an ecosystem for research and actions on innovative practices that promote open and collaborative innovation processes by engaging all relevant stakeholders and people in different relevant contexts [2] (p. 7).…”
Section: Rural Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Howaldt & Schwarz, 2010;Avelino et al, 2015) or sustainable product-service-systems (Liedtke et al, 2015). An integrative model of sustainable practices was elsewhere proposed (Liedtke et al, 2013d;Hasselkuß et al, 2017), which links the MLP of transition research and social practice theories. With this model activities and daily routines involving consumption (Warde, 2005) are analysed as so called social practices as a theoretical approach from sociology (Reckwitz, 2002;Shove et al, 2012).…”
Section: Transition Research and Practice Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well-known concept of transition research is the multi-level perspective (MLP) which describes an interplay of socio-technical regimes, niches and landscapes in transitions (Geels, 2004). Building on the link between the MLP and social practice theories that was elaborated elsewhere (Liedtke, Hasselkuß, Welfens, Nordmann & Baedeker, 2013d;Hasselkuß, Baedeker & Liedtke, 2017) and that was recently proposed in transition research (Geels, McMeekin, Mylan & Southerton, 2015), we aim to show change of practices through sustainable product-service-design. Often strategies for sustainability focus on technological innovation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation