2012
DOI: 10.1332/147084411x581899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social policy learning and diffusion in China: the rise of welfare regions?

Abstract: This article offers an account of the peculiar phenomenon of social policy learning in China, and illustrates the situations in which local policy learning can either facilitate, or constrain, the capacity of the central government to monitor social policy development. Based on analyses of the urban pension reform and the introduction of the Minimum Living Standard Scheme, the article concludes that local activism has become an eclectic tool for policy learning and diffusion leading to subnationalisation of so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional understanding of the Chinese politicaladministrative system is one of authoritarian top-down governance. However, recent studies have modified this picture by pointing at interactions between different levels, alternatively termed fragmented authoritarianism (Lieberthal & Oksenberg 1988); adaptive governance (Heilmann & Perry 2011); policy learning, or experimentation under hierarchy (Shi 2012); the bifurcated governing strategy of deregulation and re-regulation according to sectors' strategic importance (Hsueh 2011); or project governance (Qu 2012). The Chinese tradition of experimentation locally and subsequent top-down directives might, in combination with the role played by local CPC members, provide a basis for a similar process as that applied in the Norwegian case.…”
Section: Implications Pertaining To Agricultural and Environmental Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional understanding of the Chinese politicaladministrative system is one of authoritarian top-down governance. However, recent studies have modified this picture by pointing at interactions between different levels, alternatively termed fragmented authoritarianism (Lieberthal & Oksenberg 1988); adaptive governance (Heilmann & Perry 2011); policy learning, or experimentation under hierarchy (Shi 2012); the bifurcated governing strategy of deregulation and re-regulation according to sectors' strategic importance (Hsueh 2011); or project governance (Qu 2012). The Chinese tradition of experimentation locally and subsequent top-down directives might, in combination with the role played by local CPC members, provide a basis for a similar process as that applied in the Norwegian case.…”
Section: Implications Pertaining To Agricultural and Environmental Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to one referee for reminding the author of this point. For detailed exploration of the issue see Shi (2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given wide regional disparities in the reform era, considerable autonomy has been granted to local governments in their responsibility for social policy, leading to further regional variety of social security design (cf. Heilmann, 2008Heilmann, , 2009Shi, 2012).…”
Section: The 'Variable Geometry' Of China's Social Policy Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous literature has long focused on the behavior of the Chinese central government that recognizes policy innovations frequently and spreads them “from point to surface” with administrative signals (Heilmann, ; North, , pp. 80–81; Shi, ; Zhu, ). In the early stage, local governments facing social demands are motivated to test different policy innovations according to national goals and local preferences.…”
Section: Diffusion With Central Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%