2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social perception of urban agriculture in Latin-America. A case study in Mexican social housing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
16
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, region-specific socio-political valuation information and methods that also prioritize sustainability and equity are direly needed. We are awared that in the time during the review-acceptance process of the manuscript, new studies from LAC are beginning to address issues such as urban ecosystem disservices, spatio-temporal intercity comparisons of UES, and the social value of provisioning UES among others (Almeida et al 2018;Banzhaf et al 2018;De Mola et al 2018;Dobbs et al 2018;Escobedo et al 2018;Moser et al 2018;Nadal et al 2018). Although we did identify similarities and dissimilarities in relation to how UES are defined, used, applied, and institutionalized between LAC and other developed regions, we conclude that standardized approaches from developed countries should continue to be used to complement, but not substitute for, LAC-specific models and frameworks for applying the UES approach in the region.…”
Section: Context and Demand Need To Be Accounted For When Valuing Uesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, region-specific socio-political valuation information and methods that also prioritize sustainability and equity are direly needed. We are awared that in the time during the review-acceptance process of the manuscript, new studies from LAC are beginning to address issues such as urban ecosystem disservices, spatio-temporal intercity comparisons of UES, and the social value of provisioning UES among others (Almeida et al 2018;Banzhaf et al 2018;De Mola et al 2018;Dobbs et al 2018;Escobedo et al 2018;Moser et al 2018;Nadal et al 2018). Although we did identify similarities and dissimilarities in relation to how UES are defined, used, applied, and institutionalized between LAC and other developed regions, we conclude that standardized approaches from developed countries should continue to be used to complement, but not substitute for, LAC-specific models and frameworks for applying the UES approach in the region.…”
Section: Context and Demand Need To Be Accounted For When Valuing Uesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UA can be defined as the production of food (including all activities directly or indirectly related to such production, including recycling and waste management or the distribution of the products that result from such projects) in urban, suburban and periurban areas (Dubbeling et al, 2017). UA represents an alternative to the current value chains with regard to meeting the demand for food in urban areas, and it can serve as an ideal tool to cover cities' food needs and, at the same time, develop a fundamental role in other areas of city life (Nadal et al, 2018;Sanyé-Mengual, Anguelovski, Oliver-Solà, Montero, & Rieradevall, 2016).…”
Section: Uagr Functionalities and Experiences In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apesar da agricultura urbana e periurbana estar sendo inserida no planejamento urbano de várias cidades, isso não necessariamente significa que essa atividade esteja sendo estimulada, principalmente acerca das características das moradias. Isto é, tem-se modelos de habitação, cuja área é demasiadamente limitada para o desenvolvimento da agricultura urbana e periurbana (NADAL et al, 2018). Dificuldades para incluir a agricultura urbana e periurbana ao planejamento urbano estariam na execução de qualquer estratégia oficial.…”
Section: Revisão Sistemáticaunclassified