2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Organizational Life Cycle Assessment (SO-LCA) and Organization 4.0: An easy-to-implement method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also provides a relevant framework for industry practitioners van Schalkwyk et al ( 2018 ) This article discussed the different types of technologies, from heat to mass transfer, environmental impact, and system simulation, that will lead to knowledge through data Kumar et al ( 2021 ) The research identifies the major obstacles to the successful implementation of CE and Industry 4.0. The major obstacles are a lack of policies and a lack of government support García-Muiña et al ( 2022 ) The study integrates social organizational life cycle assessment and Industry 4.0 to measure the performance of manufacturing industries Rejeb et al ( 2022 ) The study analyzes the current research methods in conjunction with the internet of things and CE as innovative technologies Mishra et al ( 2022 ) This study identifies the positive impact of CE, resource optimization, and digitalization on fulfilling the goal of a net-zero economy Kurniawan et al ( 2022 ) The authors emphasized that recycled goods through mobile applications and waste recycling can create more job opportunities in a country Peiró et al ( 2021 ) This article discussed the digital and standard technologies for CE in terms of a few projects Dantas et al ( 2021 ) The study is a critical literature review based upon 50 articles on CE and Industry 4.0 technology Nandi et al ( 2021 ) The study is all about multi-level stakeholders in an organizational supply chain. The results lead to sustainable consumption and production Burmaoglu et al ( 2022 ) Researchers identified four major areas in business models, industrial manufacturing, additive manufacturing, and sharing economy Agrawal et al ( 2022 ) The authors studied digitalization for CE and the consumer’s involvement in it …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also provides a relevant framework for industry practitioners van Schalkwyk et al ( 2018 ) This article discussed the different types of technologies, from heat to mass transfer, environmental impact, and system simulation, that will lead to knowledge through data Kumar et al ( 2021 ) The research identifies the major obstacles to the successful implementation of CE and Industry 4.0. The major obstacles are a lack of policies and a lack of government support García-Muiña et al ( 2022 ) The study integrates social organizational life cycle assessment and Industry 4.0 to measure the performance of manufacturing industries Rejeb et al ( 2022 ) The study analyzes the current research methods in conjunction with the internet of things and CE as innovative technologies Mishra et al ( 2022 ) This study identifies the positive impact of CE, resource optimization, and digitalization on fulfilling the goal of a net-zero economy Kurniawan et al ( 2022 ) The authors emphasized that recycled goods through mobile applications and waste recycling can create more job opportunities in a country Peiró et al ( 2021 ) This article discussed the digital and standard technologies for CE in terms of a few projects Dantas et al ( 2021 ) The study is a critical literature review based upon 50 articles on CE and Industry 4.0 technology Nandi et al ( 2021 ) The study is all about multi-level stakeholders in an organizational supply chain. The results lead to sustainable consumption and production Burmaoglu et al ( 2022 ) Researchers identified four major areas in business models, industrial manufacturing, additive manufacturing, and sharing economy Agrawal et al ( 2022 ) The authors studied digitalization for CE and the consumer’s involvement in it …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is rich scientific literature on a wide range of sustainable development contexts, the need for highquality and reliable sustainability information is still in place. The complexity of monitoring and reporting sustainability matters needs particular attention due to the critical role in decision-making and related consequences on environmental, economic, and social issues at local, national and international levels (Torkayesh, 2022;García-Muiña et al, 2022). The criteria of relevance, accurateness, completeness, and topicality need to be considered when dealing with sustainability information, and the usage of international trustworthy tools, initiatives and standards, generally recognized as good practices in the domain, gain particular relevance for a better understanding of the challenges of quality data and information for country and corporate levels.…”
Section: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%