Social networks and the resilience of rural communities in the Global South: a critical review and conceptual reflections

Abstract

ABSTRACT. In the last decades, a growing scholarship has outlined the crucial role of social networks as a source of resilience. However, with regard to the Global South, the role of social networks for the resilience of rural communities remains an underresearched and underconceptualized issue, because research remains scattered between different strands and has rarely been integrated from a resilience perspective. To provide common ground for the exchange between disciplines and to identify steps towards a more comprehensive social network perspective on the resilience of rural communities in the Global South, we present a systematic review of contemporary case studies from three strands of research: (i) natural resource management, (ii) agricultural innovation, and (iii) social support. Although studies in each strand have their own particular strengths and weaknesses in addressing aspects of the resilience of rural communities in the Global South, they all share a static view of the outcomes of social networks, tend to emphasize structure over agency, and neglect spatial dimensions of social relations. To address these challenges, we propose a translocal social network perspective on resilience that views rural communities as being embedded in social networks that connect people and facilitate the flow of resources, information, and knowledge between places.

Migration influenced by environmental change in Africa: A systematic review of empirical evidence

“…Subsequently, more recent research on the migration-environment nexus has broadened and diversified its focus conceptually and methodologically. Scholars have moved beyond the question of how the environment migration influences the migration decision and ask how migration might contribute to climate-change adaptation (McLeman and Smit 2006;Gemenne and Blocher 2017) and resilience building (Sakdapolrak et al 2016;Rockenbauch and Sakdapolrak 2017;Tebboth, Conway, and Adger 2019). Furthermore, the one-sided focus on mobile populations has been supplemented by research on different forms of immobility, including trapped populations (Zickgraf 2018;Ayeb-Karlsson, Smith, and Kniveton 2018).…”

Green without envy: how social capital alleviates tensions from a Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) program in Indonesia

“…First, the resilience of social capital and second, how social capital promotes community resilience. Community resilience is theorized to reside in the strength of social networks (Rockenbauch and Sakdapolrak 2017). Within the research on social capital, more emphasis has been placed on how social capital can promote community resilience.…”

“…Social capital develops over long periods of time (Leahy and Anderson 2010), thus demonstrating causality necessitates research time horizons beyond the scope and scale of this research. Adding to this, we also focus on social capital as an asset, ignoring migration-induced feedbacks (Rockenbauch and Sakdapolrak 2017). Finally, our study follows a similar limitation of many other social capital studies whereby we face an endogeneity issue, making it difficult to identify if the components (e.g., trust, networks) of social capital are outcomes or indicators of social capital (Durlauf 2002).…”

Combining social network analysis and agent-based modelling to explore dynamics of human interaction: A review

“…These connections to others provide possibilities and constraints for action (Bianchi & Squazzoni, 2015;Borgatti & Foster, 2003;Granovetter, 1985;Macy & Willer, 2002;Smith & Christakis, 2008). The network structure can be seen as a form of coordination which enables collective action, self-organization and cross-scale support (Cumming, 2016;Rockenbauch & Sakdapolrak, 2017). An agent's network position provides social capital which leads to certain achievements, success or power.…”