2014
DOI: 10.2196/resprot.3317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Networking Versus Facebook Advertising to Recruit Survey Respondents: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Abstract: BackgroundIncreasingly, social contact and knowledge of other people’s attitudes and behavior are mediated by online social media such as Facebook. The main research to which this recruitment study pertains investigates the influence of parents on adolescent alcohol consumption. Given the pervasiveness of online social media use, Facebook may be an effective means of recruitment and intervention delivery.ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of study recruitment via social networks … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Facebook advertising can be more cost-effective and time-efficient than other internet recruitment methods (Loxton et al, 2015; Ramo & Prochaska, 2012; Ramo, Rodriguez, Chavez, Sommer, & Prochaska, 2014). Studies have used Facebook to successfully recruit adult participants (Batterham, 2014; Nelson, Hughes, Oakes, Pankow, & Kulasingam, 2014) as well as adolescent participants (Altshuler, Storey, & Prager, 2015; Chu & Snider, 2013; Ellis et al, 2012; Fenner et al, 2012; Gilligan, Kypri, & Bourke, 2014; Mustanski, Greene, Ryan, & Whitton, 2015). With the exception of Mustanski et al (2015), however, these studies were cross-sectional and did not require parental permission for adolescent participation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facebook advertising can be more cost-effective and time-efficient than other internet recruitment methods (Loxton et al, 2015; Ramo & Prochaska, 2012; Ramo, Rodriguez, Chavez, Sommer, & Prochaska, 2014). Studies have used Facebook to successfully recruit adult participants (Batterham, 2014; Nelson, Hughes, Oakes, Pankow, & Kulasingam, 2014) as well as adolescent participants (Altshuler, Storey, & Prager, 2015; Chu & Snider, 2013; Ellis et al, 2012; Fenner et al, 2012; Gilligan, Kypri, & Bourke, 2014; Mustanski, Greene, Ryan, & Whitton, 2015). With the exception of Mustanski et al (2015), however, these studies were cross-sectional and did not require parental permission for adolescent participation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62,[64][65][66] There is necessarily a limitation in that the populations accessed by these methods will vary as a function of age and access to technology; however, similar issues have arisen with the use of classical methods, like landline phone communication, particularly among younger populations. 67,68 The reverse age limitation is found with social media and mobile methods 66 .…”
Section: The Role Of Social Media and Mobile Technologies In Ms Epidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…due to an increase in exclusive use of mobile phones or email rather than traditional mail or landline phone. Opportunistic approaches such as recruitment via social media promise cost savings [4,[7][8][9][10][11][12] and a better coverage of person groups that are hard to reach with the traditional recruitment methods, like parents of adolescents [8], adolescents themselves [10], people with special conditions [13,14], smokers [15] or low-income people [16]. Social media, like Facebook and Twitter, can potentially have a strong snowballing effect [17] given their intensive use and continuing growth (around 1.94 billion monthly active Facebook users worldwide [26]), their feature that information can be shared very easily among networks [17], and are therefore able to reach a large number of people in a very short time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%