2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1122381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Movements as Agents of Innovation: Citizen Journalism in South Korea

Abstract: This article aims to further develop the field of innovation studies by exploring the emergence of citizen journalism in South Korea's social movement sector. To achieve this aim, the framework of innovation theory has been extended to innovations in social fields beyond technology and the economy. Our findings show that the emergence of citizen journalism resulted from brokerage activities among journalists, labor and unification activists, and progressive intellectuals. Despite different cultural visions and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chopae, launched on May 11, 2010, had 730 members and generated 15,437 hashtags as of September 2010. As announced in its mission statement, Chopae has explicitly called for the closure of Chosunilbo , a national daily in Korea well known for its conservative-biased editorial agenda (Kern and Nam, 2009).…”
Section: Korea As a Test Bed For Online Activismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chopae, launched on May 11, 2010, had 730 members and generated 15,437 hashtags as of September 2010. As announced in its mission statement, Chopae has explicitly called for the closure of Chosunilbo , a national daily in Korea well known for its conservative-biased editorial agenda (Kern and Nam, 2009).…”
Section: Korea As a Test Bed For Online Activismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature on citizen journalism focuses on how digital media are challenging traditional gatekeeping processes, claiming that the internet "defies the whole notion of a 'gate' and challenges the idea that journalists (or anyone else) can or should limit what passes through it" (Singer, 2006, p. 265). Some scholars view citizen journalism positively as "a reconceptualization of traditional notions of the guard-dog media and the public sphere" (Antony & Thomas, 2010, p. 1280, characterizing it as a form of active citizenship that strengthens democracy (Harcup, 2011) and an invaluable resource for social movements (Kern & Nam, 2009;Kwong, 2015). Other scholars have been more critical, arguing that some public engagement practices embraced by news organizations, such as allowing user contributions on websites, are not true citizen journalism as these often serve not as actual news content but as news sources used by the professional journalists to supplement their own work (Bakker & Pantti, 2009;Storm, 2006).…”
Section: The Syrian Crisis Social Media and Citizen Journalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the received dominance, agenda-setting ability, and mobilizing power of the conservative papers were significantly challenged and broken by the active and well-coordinated online networks and alternative forms of media channels. As previously stated, a number of citizens – including ‘citizen journalists’ and independent cultural workers – were able to gather a variety of substantial information about mad cow disease and the government’s handling of the beef issue, including official and expert-created documents and statements, and disseminated and shared their views and analyses, and activated deliberations through multiple online channels (Kern and Nam, 2009). It should be emphasized that this was a pursuit and result of a self-reflective learning process and horizontal networking that was done with much speed, impact, and energy.…”
Section: Media Representations and The Fierce Struggles Over Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%