Social motor synchrony in autism spectrum conditions: A systematic review
Devyn Glass,
Nicola Yuill
Abstract:Some researchers suggest difficulties synchronising with a partner could underpin the social differences associated with Autism Spectrum Condition, potentially acting as a marker for autism. Social Motor Synchrony (SMS) is one aspect of synchrony that could augment observational diagnostic procedures. However, the full breadth of literature examining SMS in autism has not been systematically reviewed. A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines… Show more
“…Despite this, most synchrony studies have involved unfamiliar partnerships or have been situated in unfamiliar environments, such as university study centers (e.g., Fitzpatrick et al, 2017 ; Georgescu et al, 2020 ; Liu et al, 2021 ). Glass and Yuill (2023) found autistic pairs displayed similar synchrony to non-autistic pairs in carefully considered social contexts: in familiar settings and partnerships with personalized tasks. It remains unclear whether the lower synchrony previously observed in mixed pairs (e.g., Georgescu et al, 2020 ) is the result of an interpersonal mismatch, or whether this is influenced, and may be improved, by other contextual factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“… Romero et al (2018) , for instance, found higher than chance levels of synchrony between autistic children and therapists in child-led conversations. Other studies have shown that synchrony between pairs of autistic children can equal synchrony between pairs of non-autistic children when the settings and partners are familiar, and when tasks are personalized ( Glass and Yuill, 2023 ). The current results contribute to a growing body of literature challenging the idea that autistic people have impaired synchrony and demonstrate the importance of task selection in synchrony research.…”
IntroductionSome research indicates that neurodivergent people are less likely than “neurotypical” people to adapt their movements to a partner’s movements to facilitate interpersonal motor synchrony. Researchers therefore suggest synchrony deficits underlie the social differences associated with autism and other neurodivergences. Intensive Interaction (II) is a client-led approach, where Learning Support Workers (LSW) follow the lead of learners to create balanced and reciprocal interactions.MethodsWe aimed to examine the balance of synchrony in learners with autism and Severe Learning Disabilities and their LSWs in a special education college where learners had prior experience with II. Using Motion Energy Analysis, we assessed the degree to which each partner acted as a leader, and hence which partner acted as a follower, during moments of close synchrony.ResultsOverall, learners and LSWs showed higher than chance synchrony. There were no differences in the degree to which each partner led the moments of synchrony, or the amount pairs synchronized with zero-lag, where there was no delay between each partners’ movements.DiscussionThe equal balance of leading and following in the learner and LSW pairs demonstrates that both partners consistently adapted their movements to their partner’s movements to facilitate synchrony. The findings tentatively challenge the notion of a synchrony deficit in autism and suggest synchrony can be present in cross-neurotype pairs in comfortable and engaging conditions. We discuss the potential for client-led, movement-based approaches to support smooth interactions across neurotypes.
“…Despite this, most synchrony studies have involved unfamiliar partnerships or have been situated in unfamiliar environments, such as university study centers (e.g., Fitzpatrick et al, 2017 ; Georgescu et al, 2020 ; Liu et al, 2021 ). Glass and Yuill (2023) found autistic pairs displayed similar synchrony to non-autistic pairs in carefully considered social contexts: in familiar settings and partnerships with personalized tasks. It remains unclear whether the lower synchrony previously observed in mixed pairs (e.g., Georgescu et al, 2020 ) is the result of an interpersonal mismatch, or whether this is influenced, and may be improved, by other contextual factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“… Romero et al (2018) , for instance, found higher than chance levels of synchrony between autistic children and therapists in child-led conversations. Other studies have shown that synchrony between pairs of autistic children can equal synchrony between pairs of non-autistic children when the settings and partners are familiar, and when tasks are personalized ( Glass and Yuill, 2023 ). The current results contribute to a growing body of literature challenging the idea that autistic people have impaired synchrony and demonstrate the importance of task selection in synchrony research.…”
IntroductionSome research indicates that neurodivergent people are less likely than “neurotypical” people to adapt their movements to a partner’s movements to facilitate interpersonal motor synchrony. Researchers therefore suggest synchrony deficits underlie the social differences associated with autism and other neurodivergences. Intensive Interaction (II) is a client-led approach, where Learning Support Workers (LSW) follow the lead of learners to create balanced and reciprocal interactions.MethodsWe aimed to examine the balance of synchrony in learners with autism and Severe Learning Disabilities and their LSWs in a special education college where learners had prior experience with II. Using Motion Energy Analysis, we assessed the degree to which each partner acted as a leader, and hence which partner acted as a follower, during moments of close synchrony.ResultsOverall, learners and LSWs showed higher than chance synchrony. There were no differences in the degree to which each partner led the moments of synchrony, or the amount pairs synchronized with zero-lag, where there was no delay between each partners’ movements.DiscussionThe equal balance of leading and following in the learner and LSW pairs demonstrates that both partners consistently adapted their movements to their partner’s movements to facilitate synchrony. The findings tentatively challenge the notion of a synchrony deficit in autism and suggest synchrony can be present in cross-neurotype pairs in comfortable and engaging conditions. We discuss the potential for client-led, movement-based approaches to support smooth interactions across neurotypes.
“…Our mediating model of motor, EF, and social function could be partially explained by the theory of social movement synchronization (SMS) in autistic population ( 65 , 66 ), which refers to synchronous motor movements within social interaction. The motor-social relationship might be attributed to the deficit of SMS among autistic children, particularly when intentional SMS tasks were involved ( 65 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our mediating model of motor, EF, and social function could be partially explained by the theory of social movement synchronization (SMS) in autistic population ( 65 , 66 ), which refers to synchronous motor movements within social interaction. The motor-social relationship might be attributed to the deficit of SMS among autistic children, particularly when intentional SMS tasks were involved ( 65 ). These intentional SMS tasks generally involve additional processing demands, such as attention, working memory and movement planning, posing challenges for autistic individuals with EF difficulties ( 67 ).…”
BackgroundMotor coordination difficulties could contribute to social communication deficits in autistic children. However, the exploration of the mechanism implicated in these claims has been limited by the lack of potential confounders such as executive function (EF).MethodsWe investigated the role that EF plays in the relationship between motor coordination and social communication in a school-aged autistic population via a structural model in a statistically robust manner. The results of questionnaires, including the Developmental Coordination Disorder questionnaire, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, and the Social Responsiveness Scale, were collected to measure motor coordination, social communication deficits, and EF.ResultsA total of 182 autistic children (7.61±1.31 years, 87.9% boys) were included in the final analysis. In the model with EF as a mediator, the total effect (β=-0.599, P<0.001) and the direct effect (β=-0.331, P =0.003) of motor coordination function on social communication were both significant among autistic children without intellectual disability (ID), as were indirect effects through EF (β=-0.268, P<0.001).ConclusionEF partially mediates the motor coordination and social communication correlation among autistic children. We suggest that motor coordination should be included in the routine evaluation of autistic surveillance and rehabilitation procedures.
Some suggest autistic people display impaired Interpersonal Synchrony. However, partners of different neurotypes can struggle to connect and empathise with one another. We used Motion Energy Analysis to examine Social Motor Synchrony (SMS) in familiar partners of the same neurotype: pairs of autistic and of neurotypical children. Partners played two shared tablet activities, one to support collaboration by facilitating engagement and other-awareness (Connect), and one with no additional design features to facilitate collaboration (Colours). The neurotypical group showed similar SMS to the autistic group in Colours but lower SMS in Connect. The autistic group displayed similar levels of SMS in each activity. Autistic children can synchronise to a similar, or greater, degree than neurotypical children when the social context and type of task are considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.