This article examines possible working memory deficits in 7-8-year-olds who are accurate readers but relatively poor comprehenders. In Expt 1, poor comprehenders scored below good comprehenders on a non-linguistic test of working memory (reading series of digits and recalling the last digit in each series) on the more taxing items. Experiment 2 examined the relationship between working memory and text comprehension using an anomaly resolution task. Good and poor comprehenders heard stories describing an adult's anomalous emotional response to a child's action, some of which contained information to resolve the anomaly. The load on working memory imposed by the need to integrate the resolution with the anomaly was varied in two ways: the resolution was presented immediately next to, or two sentences distant from, the anomaly, and appeared either before or after the anomaly. Poor comprehenders were worse than good ones at anomaly resolution only when the anomalous and resolving information were separated. The results support the hypothesis that text processing is influenced by working memory demands and suggest that children's comprehension is related to the efficiency of a general non-linguistic working memory system.
The present research addressed children's understanding of self-presentational display rules: putting on false facial expressions in order to manipulate others' evaluations of the self. A sample of 4-to 6-year-olds was used to test our hypothesis that selfpresentational display rules involve recursive cognition about others' mental states. Children completed a task measuring understanding of various display rules and additionally performed a second-order false-belief task. Results supported the hypothesis that an appreciation of second-order mental representation is associated with understanding self-presentational display rules but not with understanding prosocial display rules (designed to spare others' feelings). We discuss the likely interaction of social processes with the observed changes in mental-state understanding in relation to the development of self-presentation.
Briri.vh Journulo/ Drveloptm~rital Ps.)'c.ho/ogy ( 1984) 2, 73 8 I ('; 1Y84 The British Psychological Society Pritird bi Griwi Brilriiri
Previous studies show that 7-8-year-old poor comprehenders differ from good comprehenders, matched in age and decoding skill, primarily in their failure to make highlevel inferences, despite adequate text recall. The impact of inference awareness training on reading comprehension in two such groups was compared with the effects of two other treatments. Inference-trained children were instructed over 4 weeks in making inferences from text and generating questions. Other groups were trained either in rapid decoding or in standard comprehension exercises. Less skilled comprehenders given inference training improved significantly more than those given decoding practice, and slightly, but not significantly, more than those given comprehension exercises. Skilled comprehenders showed little improvement regardless of treatment condition. The results are discussed in relation to possible sources of comprehension failure, and implications for remediation.In a series of studies of children with adequate decoding skills, but poor reading comprehension, Oakhill (1982Oakhill ( , 1984 has shown that such children have specific deficits in constructive memory and inference skills. Poor comprehenders were compared with good comprehenders, who were similar in decoding skill, but superior in comprehension skill. This method of subject selection prevents comprehension skill being confounded with differences in decoding abilities. However, as Campione and Armbruster (1984) point out, when investigating the source of such deficits one cannot totally rule out the possibility that there is some crucial aspect of decoding, not measured by the tests used, that differentiates between the two groups, and might therefore explain the differences found. One way of testing this possibility is to gain convergent evidence using a training study. If less skilled comprehenders can be trained in the skills they are claimed to lack, then they should show improvements in comprehension skill. Campione and Armbruster describe several different possible outcomes of such a study, comparing trained and untrained children in deficient and normal groups. The outcome that points most clearly to the causal role of the trained skills is achieved when trained less skilled comprehenders improve to the level of skilled comprehenders, and skilled comprehenders remain at the same high level of *Correspondence should be addressed to Nicola Yuill, who is now at the MRC Unit on the Development and Integration of Behaviour, Madingley, Cambridge CB3 8AA, England. Jane Oakhill is at the MRC Perceptual and Cognitive Performance Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton BNI 9QG, England. This research was funded by an ESRCproject grant to Alan Parkin, whose help we gratefully acknowledge. We are also very grateful for the cooperation of the staff and pupils of Balfour, Coombe Road, Downs, Fairlight and Moukecoomb Junior Schools.
Previous research has underestimated children's capacity to understand the selfpresentational behaviour of other people. We argue from recent research in mental-state understanding that 8-year-olds should be able to attribute self-presentational motives in order to explain others' behaviour. In the present study, children aged 6 to 11 years heard stories involving emotion-masking displays and were then asked to explain the motivations for those displays. Results supported our prediction.
Two conflicting developmental accounts of how mental states are used in evaluating actors are tested by varying actors' intentionality, foreknowledge of outcome, and the values of motive and outcome. In Experiment 1, children judged a recipient's emotional reaction to three types of event: intended outcome, foreseen accident, and unforeseen accident. Both 6-and 7-year-olds used intentionality and knowledge in their judgments of good and bad outcomes. Three-year-olds did not distinguish between accidents differing in actors' foreknowledge, but discriminated between intended and accidental outcomes when the accident was unforeseen. In Experiment 2, children judged actor's responsibility for accidentally caused bad outcomes. Seven-year-olds, but not 5-year-olds, blamed actors for foreseen accidents more than for unforeseen accidents regardless of motive value. The results suggest that children use intentionality before knowledge in judgments of action sequences, and that actor's foreknowledge of an outcome influences children's ability to judge the intended/accidental distinction.
This paper reports two experiments which explore the nature of comprehension deficits in children with normal word recognition ability. In Experiment 1, skilled and less-skilled comprehenders listened to a series of stories. They were then given an unexpected recognition test comprised of some original sentences, some sentences that were valid inferences from the'original stories, and some that were invalid inferences. Both groups falsely identified more valid than invalid inference foils, but this difference was significantly larger for the skilled comprehenders. These results confirm and extend the findings of Oakhill (1982). They indicate that skilled comprehenders engage in more constructive processing, and that the effect does not depend on the subjects being given deliberate memorisation instructions. Experiment 2 investigated whether the difference between skilled and less-skilled comprehenders is related to their working memory capabilities, using the paradigm devised by Hitch and Halliday (1983). No difference between the groups was found. This result suggests that impairment in comprehension does not stem from a defective working memory. Other possible explanations for the differences between the groups are considered. RESUME Sur la nature de la dvfbrence entre ceux dont la compbtence de ComprPhension a t plus ou moins PlevPeCette btude rend compte de deux expbriences consacrks B un probl&me de lecture relativement nbgligb: celui d'enfants dont la reconnaissance des mots et du vocabulaire visuel sont normaux mais qui ont nkanmoins, des probl8mes de comprbhension. Des recherches prkkdentes men& par Oakhill (1982, 1983, 1984) ont ISSN 0 1 4 1 4 2 3 $2.00 0 1986 Journul ofReseurch in Reading (UKRA) COMPREHENSION SKILL 81 montrk qu'une des diffkrences les plus importantes entre des lecteurs dont la compktence de comprkhension est klevke et ceux dont elle l'est moins provient du fait que les premiers sont davantage capables de faire des dkductions correctes I partir de phrases et de textes. Lors de la premiere expkrience, des lecteurs de 7 I 8 ans, I la compktence de comprkhension variable, ont kcoutk de courtes histoires. 11s ont ensuite ktk soumis I un test de reconnaissance comprenant des phrases ktant des implications justes tirkes des histoires et d'autres ktant de fausses implications. Les deux groupes ont faussement identifik davantage d'implications justes que de fausses, mais cette diffkrence ktait nettement plus marqute chez ceux dont la compktence de comprkhension est plus klevke. I1 n'y avait pas de diffkrence entre les deux groupes quant h la reconnaissance des phrases extraites des histoires. Cette expkrience reproduit pour l'essentiel une expkrience dkjh menke (Oakhill, 1982) avec toutefois un changement de procedure important. Dans l'expkrience prkckdente, les sujets savaient que leur mkmoire allait k r e testke, de sorte que, puis-qu'ils s'attendaient I ce que leur mkmoire soit test&, les differences entre les groupes reflktaient peut-&re leurs aptitudes h appliquer des stratkgies de mkmor...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.