Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content

Abstract

Despite the popular use of social media by consumers and marketers, empirical research investigating their economic values still lags. In this study, we integrate qualitative user-marketer interaction content data from a fan page brand community on Facebook and consumer transactions data to assemble a unique data set at the individual consumer level. We then quantify the impact of community contents from consumers (user-generated content, i.e., UGC) and marketers (marketer-generated content, i.e., MGC) on consumers' apparel purchase expenditures. A content analysis method was used to construct measures to capture the informative and persuasive nature of UGC and MGC while distinguishing between directed and undirected communication modes in the brand community. In our empirical analysis, we exploit differences across consumers' fan page joining decision and across timing differences in fan page joining dates for our model estimation and identification strategies. Importantly, we also control for potential self-selection biases and relevant factors such as pricing, promotion, social network attributes, consumer demographics, and unobserved heterogeneity. Our findings show that engagement in social media brand communities leads to a positive increase in purchase expenditures. Additional examinations of UGC and MGC impacts show evidence of social media contents affecting consumer purchase behavior through embedded information and persuasion. We also uncover the different roles played by UGC and MGC, which vary by the type of directed or undirected communication modes by consumers and the marketer. Specifically, the elasticities of demand with respect to UGC information richness are 0.006 (directed communication) and 3.140 (undirected communication), whereas those for MGC information richness are insignificant. Moreover, the UGC valence elasticity of demand is 0.180 (undirected communication), whereas that for MGC valence is 0.004 (directed communication). Overall, UGC exhibits a stronger impact than MGC on consumer purchase behavior. Our findings provide various implications for academic research and practice.

The Effects of Traditional and Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Destination Image: A Case of Vacation Tourists Visiting Branson, Missouri

“…Though personal eWOM tends to be perceived as more credible, other evidence exists as well. To illustrate, on one hand, Goh, Heng, and Lin [55] found that personal eWOM exhibited a stronger impact than commercial eWOM on consumer purchase behavior. Similarly, Gretzel and Yoo [56] suggest that on-line travel reviews are often perceived as more likely to provide up-to-date, enjoyable, and reliable information than content posted by travel service suppliers.…”

Sharing of Sponsored Advertisements on Social Media: A Uses and Gratifications Perspective

“…It has been found that overall UGC exhibits a stronger impact than MGC on consumer purchase behaviour (Goh et al 2013) and that UGC on social media can equal the effects of large advertising spends on traditional media (Lee et al 2017). Content sharing is especially useful for service industries such as tourism as their intangible nature and lack of trialability results in consumers seeking information from a variety of different sources during the research phase and making purchase decisions heavily influenced by the information gathered (Leung et al 2013).…”

The Ways of Prosumers’ Knowledge Sharing with Organizations

“…It is worth stressing, that the analyses of prosumers' engagement in prosumer-oriented projects should not be limited just to social media tools such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and so on. Obviously, they are very popular and in turn one can find plenty of that kind of projects without much trouble (Fuchs, 2017;Goh, Heng, & Lin, 2013). Prosumers' engagement may take a number of diverse forms, ranging from games and contests, through testing and evaluating, to serious initiatives aimed at encouraging them to design new products or suggest improvements to existing ones (Barger, Peltier, & Schultz, 2016;Vashisht & Pillai, 2017).…”