2015
DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520288386.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Life of Forensic Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory studies, 1 which were quite popular at the start of the 90s, showed, through ethnographic observation, how scientists generate among themselves interactive processes that make it possible to reach a consensus, in order to agree upon what a good match is or is not. In other words, accurate measurements are contingent, local achievements (Derksen, 2000;Kruse, 2016;Lynch et al, 2008). Some authors have noted the existence of cooperation activities, aiming to reach consensus, so a standard can be expanded and used by heterogeneous communities, as well as used in different activities and places (Bowker & Star, 1999)-an approach that is close to the functionalist perspective.…”
Section: Continuum Between Subjective and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory studies, 1 which were quite popular at the start of the 90s, showed, through ethnographic observation, how scientists generate among themselves interactive processes that make it possible to reach a consensus, in order to agree upon what a good match is or is not. In other words, accurate measurements are contingent, local achievements (Derksen, 2000;Kruse, 2016;Lynch et al, 2008). Some authors have noted the existence of cooperation activities, aiming to reach consensus, so a standard can be expanded and used by heterogeneous communities, as well as used in different activities and places (Bowker & Star, 1999)-an approach that is close to the functionalist perspective.…”
Section: Continuum Between Subjective and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kruse () discusses how they work across “epistemic cultures.” Drawing on the work of Knorr‐Cetina (), she highlights how CSEs straddle different police, science and courtroom “law” knowledge communities, helping forensic evidence to flow between different sites. In this context, the CSE not only has a core role as “the vanguard of the forensic science laboratory at the crime scene,” (Kruse, , p. 92), but they work to help bridge and mediate between the different communities involved in the criminal justice system. The CSE has a hybrid role and an ethnographic lens allows one to access this, as demonstrated in the examples below.…”
Section: Learning and Doing Crime Scene Examination: Straddling Scienmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, administrative mistakes were taken to infer the potential of contamination (i.e., if you are not careful with your administration, how can we trust you were careful in your trace recovery practices?). As highlighted by Kruse (), through mediating relations between the trace and wider arenas where forensics are used, the CSE aids the flow of “evidence to be” between different sites, actors and audiences. Whereas in the police their expertise may be actively sought to help guide the investigation, in the courtroom the CSE's expertise is functional and demonstrated within their paperwork practices.…”
Section: Learning and Doing Crime Scene Examination: Straddling Scienmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…: 107). These scientific standards contrast with other occupational cultures in the police, forensic science, and the judiciary, in which a combination of Bdirect evidence^, such as fingerprints and DNA samples, and Bwitness statements^helps to ascertain the facts relating to a criminal case (Kruse 2016). In establishing identities of potential suspects, technologies such as CCTV (Douillet and Dumoulin 2015), fingerprint matching (Cole 2001), and DNA identification (Renard 2015, Robert andDufresne 2015) rely on networks of specialist institutions such as analysis laboratories, investigative agencies, and databases, enabling specialists to identify matches with samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%