Social Life-Cycle Assessment: A Review by Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

This study examined the literature on social life-cycle assessment (S-LCA) published in the last 15 years (2003–2018) using bibliometric methods. Applying scientific mapping and analyzing publication performance, the study describes the structure of and trends in S-LCA publications in terms of related subject categories, authors, journals, countries, and highly cited articles. Challenges and research gaps in the S-LCA literature were also explored. The content of related papers published in the ISI Web of Science databases was examined to identify the main themes investigated, evolution of publication activity, and most representative elements. Analyses were conducted with SciMAT software. This tool enables researchers to map research specialties by extracting qualitative information in the specialized literature and representing it using quantitative measures. The results show rapid and exponential growth of the S-LCA research line in the past ten years, with a clear upward trend in related publications (mostly case studies), especially after publication of the UNEP/SETAC Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products in 2009: 66% of all articles published on S-LCA were published during the period 2015–2018, primarily by European authors. The findings also delineate S-LCA as a highly fragmented research field that has been applied to diverse sectors (agriculture, bioenergy, transport, water management, chemical products, electronics, etc.), mainly in non-European countries. Critical questions concerning methods, framework, paradigms, and indicators remain to be resolved. This study provides insight into the publication performance of S-LCA, characterizing its intellectual structure and salient authors and works. In identifying hotspots in the S-LCA research, the study provides a useful state-of-the-art reference guide for academics and reveals critical research gaps and potential research avenues for future studies to advance in consolidating the discipline.

Process modelling and life cycle assessment coupled with experimental work to shape the future sustainable production of chemicals and fuels

“…The social dimension of sustainability should also be evaluated, which requires addressing challenges related to data scarcity as well as methodological gaps. 188 Indeed, combining life cycle costing and environmental LCA with social LCA could help to uncover the real potential of emerging technologies. These assessments should always be based on sound process models validated with experimental data and accounting for the synergistic effects of integrating technologies.…”

Technological Sustainability or Sustainable Technology? A Multidimensional Vision of Sustainability in Manufacturing

“…Sustainability requires an assessment of the environmental [68], social [69] and economic [70] impacts of products, processes, and organizations [71,72]. Currently, the most widely used framework for these assessments is Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) [73], which considers all the phases and processes that contribute to the manufacturing of a product, including the use and end-of-life phases [74], according to the cradle-to-grave approach [75].…”

Evaluation of Road Infrastructure Projects: A Life Cycle Sustainability-Based Decision-Making Approach

“…However, a significant number of reviewed studies (37%) followed the UNEP/SETAC guidelines as their adopted research methodology [46,47]. Furthermore, 82% of the studies were published after the year 2012, signifying a substantial methodological development stage, marking the UNEP/SETAC guidelines as a breakthrough in S-LCA progression [48].…”