2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-018-0305-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Justice Beliefs Regarding Old-Age Provisions in Germany: A Latent Profile Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the DEAS guidelines, the scale reflects the mean of at least two required (recoded) valid items. Thus, it was treated as continuous variable, which is in accordance with previous research [ 21 ]. Higher values represent higher perceived social exclusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to the DEAS guidelines, the scale reflects the mean of at least two required (recoded) valid items. Thus, it was treated as continuous variable, which is in accordance with previous research [ 21 ]. Higher values represent higher perceived social exclusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Besides, individuals were also only allowed to choose one principle, which made combinations of distributive justice preferences within domains impossible. In reality, people might even combine principles within domains (Franke & Simonson, 2018), but this is invisible with this instrument. Because of this methodological restriction, we probably overestimate consistency in preference for a particular justice principle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging domain-specificity is crucial, but it does not yet reveal the full variety and complexity of distributive justice preferences. While some individuals may apply the same justice logic universally across distributions, others call upon different criteria in their various distributive judgements (Franke & Simonson, 2018;Miller, 1992;Osipovic, 2015;Sachweh, 2012;Scott, Matland, Michelbach, & Bornstein, 2001). Franke and Simonson (2018), for instance, show that people often combine different and sometimes even seemingly 'inconsistent' or 'contradictory' social justice beliefs regard old-age provisions (cf.…”
Section: Configurations Of Distributive Justice Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations