Human Judgement and Decision Processes 1975
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397250-7.50016-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Judgment Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
199
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
199
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The person who most determinedly took up the challenge to refine and further develop the concept was Kenneth R. Hammond. Hammond, a student of Brunswik at Berkeley, extended Brunswik's ideas to the study of higher cognition, namely, judgment and decision making (e.g., Hammond, 1955;Hammond, Stewart, Brehmer, & Steinmann, 1975). Over the past 50 years, Hammond has used the notion of external validity and the requirements of representative design to critically evaluate the merits of psychological research in general and research on the normative analysis of rational behavior in particular (Hammond, 1948(Hammond, , 1951(Hammond, , 1954(Hammond, , 1955(Hammond, , 1978(Hammond, , 1986(Hammond, , 1990(Hammond, , 1996a(Hammond, , 2000Hammond, Hamm, & Grassia, 1986;Hammond & Wascoe, 1980).…”
Section: After Brunswik: Hammond's Interpretation Of Representative Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The person who most determinedly took up the challenge to refine and further develop the concept was Kenneth R. Hammond. Hammond, a student of Brunswik at Berkeley, extended Brunswik's ideas to the study of higher cognition, namely, judgment and decision making (e.g., Hammond, 1955;Hammond, Stewart, Brehmer, & Steinmann, 1975). Over the past 50 years, Hammond has used the notion of external validity and the requirements of representative design to critically evaluate the merits of psychological research in general and research on the normative analysis of rational behavior in particular (Hammond, 1948(Hammond, , 1951(Hammond, , 1954(Hammond, , 1955(Hammond, , 1978(Hammond, , 1986(Hammond, , 1990(Hammond, , 1996a(Hammond, , 2000Hammond, Hamm, & Grassia, 1986;Hammond & Wascoe, 1980).…”
Section: After Brunswik: Hammond's Interpretation Of Representative Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brehmer & Brehmer, 1988;B. Brehmer, 1994;Cooksey, 1996;Hammond et al, 1975;Libby & Lewis, 1982;Slovic & Lichtenstein, 1971). In general, achievement is high and judgments are considered to be the result of a linear, additive process in which a few, differentially weighted cues are used.…”
Section: Social Judgment Theory Policy Capturing and The Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyze individual differences, we used the approach of Jacobsen (in press). For capturing judgment strategies, we adopted the framework of social judgment theory, which defines judgment as a process that involves the integration of information from a set of cues into a judgment about some distal state of affairs (Hammond, Stewart, Brehmer, & Steinmann, 1975). The theory provides a foundation for judgment analysis, and it allows one to derive individual as well as group models.…”
Section: Aesthetic Judgment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material, perceptually salient, consisted of a well-defined range of perceptual cues, in order to keep the task purely judgmental in nature (cf. Hammond et al, 1975). Stimuli were counterbalanced across participants and thus served as their own controls.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Judgement analysis (JA) is derived from social judgement theory (Hammond et al 1975) and permits individual judgements to be modelled mathematically (Stewart, 1988). The technique has already been widely used in medical research (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%