2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.glt.2020.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social innovation in the shadow of policy failure: Energy efficiency in self-build housing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the literature, we indicate that one way to increase the EE of real estate is to use energy-efficient houses (greenhouses) [1,15,[37][38][39]. Another is to renovate and warm old buildings [40].…”
Section: Energy Efficiency and Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the literature, we indicate that one way to increase the EE of real estate is to use energy-efficient houses (greenhouses) [1,15,[37][38][39]. Another is to renovate and warm old buildings [40].…”
Section: Energy Efficiency and Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UK government's policy of zero-carbon homes, introduced by the Labour Party in 2006, was aimed at ensuring the sustainability of future housing stock. The aim was to improve the practices of current house builders in terms of the sustainable properties offered by their products and the infrastructure to which they are connected (low-emission heating and electricity) [10][11][12]. A much better example worth emulating here is China, where in the sector of new urban buildings, it is required that 50% of new buildings be green buildings [13].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the response received by a zero-carbon building is initially positive and then becomes negative (Edmondson et al, 2020). The approach is to hand over the construction of zero-carbon homes to the community with the support of financial subsidies and apply a physical framework (local land acquisition), conceptual (relationship between the house and its residents, and affective space (ease of access to administration in different responsible departments) (Lane et al, 2020) (Edmondson et al, 2020).…”
Section: Thematic Review Of Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%