2004
DOI: 10.26530/oapen_459540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Indicators for Aboriginal Governance : Insights from the Thamarrurr Region, Northern Territory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field consultations have confirmed the need for an ongoing ‘two way’ communications strategy and the development of local and project scale management tools and governance arrangements. The benchmarking process will serve these two purposes (see also Taylor 2004 on regional planning). It is anticipated that at the local level, articulating key relevant values in cultural and natural resource management, identifying practical indicators, and establishing monitoring and project management accountability will enhance Indigenous project ownership and build capacity to govern (see also Ens et al.…”
Section: Need For Biodiversity and Social Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Field consultations have confirmed the need for an ongoing ‘two way’ communications strategy and the development of local and project scale management tools and governance arrangements. The benchmarking process will serve these two purposes (see also Taylor 2004 on regional planning). It is anticipated that at the local level, articulating key relevant values in cultural and natural resource management, identifying practical indicators, and establishing monitoring and project management accountability will enhance Indigenous project ownership and build capacity to govern (see also Ens et al.…”
Section: Need For Biodiversity and Social Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the geographic size and shape of project regions will not be the same for biodiversity interests as they might be for Indigenous interests. Defining (conceptually and geographically) discrete project regions will impact the measurability of indicators across all project regions (Taylor 2004). Further, the diversity of Indigenous languages raises issues of continuity of meaning and data collection over the whole region (see also Buzzard 1990 on social analysis in developing countries) manifesting the broader issue of multiple perspectives and goals in the relationship between Indigenous land management and biodiversity conservation; a self‐determination issue for land managers and policy makers worldwide (Schmidt & Peterson 2009).…”
Section: Need For Biodiversity and Social Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those screened in Wadeye belong to one of 20 different tribal groups. Murinh Patha is the dominant group (Taylor, 2004). Those screened in Nauiyu belong to the Malak Malak group, with a mixture of tribal groups from nearby regions (Nauiyu Nambiyu Community Government Council, 2004).…”
Section: Methods Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust Indigenous statistics require a variety of inputs and examples of nuanced and alternative to standard analysis by non-Indigenous researchers abound. The Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) at the Australian National University, for example, have used Indigenous data to demonstrate arguments of Aboriginal poverty (Hunter 1999), or the non-delivery of "practical reconciliation" (Altman and Hunter 2003), or chronic education under spending on children in Wadeye (Taylor 2004). What I do advocate is an increased Indigenous perspective presence in Indigenous data production because race does matter.…”
Section: Pushing the Statistical Envelope: Indigenising Statistical Amentioning
confidence: 99%