Anthropometric measurements of Australian Aboriginal adults living in remote areas: Comparison with nationally representative findings

Abstract

To compare body size measurements in Australian Aboriginals living in three remote communities in the Northern Territory of Australia with those of the general Australian population. Height, weight, waist and hip circumferences and derivative values of body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio (WHR), waist-height ratio (WHT), and waist-weight ratios (WWT) of adult Aboriginal volunteers (n = 814), aged 25 to 74 years were compared with participants in the nationally representative 'AusDiab' survey (n = 10,434). The Aboriginal body habitus profiles differed considerably from the Australian profile. When compared to Australian females, Aboriginal females were taller and had lower hip circumference but had higher WC, WHR, WHT, and WWT (P < 0.01 for all). When compared with their Australian counterparts, Aboriginal males were shorter, had lower body weight, WC, hip circumference, BMI, and WHT but had higher WHR and WWT (P < 0.001 for all). Significantly more Aboriginal females were classified as overweight and or obese using cutoffs defined by WC and by WHR than by BMI. Aboriginal males were less often overweight and/or obese by BMI than their counterparts, but were significantly more often overweight or obese by WHR. There were significant variations in body size profiles between Aboriginal communities. However, the theme of excess waist measurements relative to their weight was uniform. Aboriginal people had preferential central fat deposition in relation to their overall weight. BMI significantly underestimated overweight and obesity as assessed by waist measurements among Aboriginals. This relationship of preferential central fat deposition to the current epidemic of chronic diseases needs to be explored further.

Optimising meropenem dosing in critically ill Australian Indigenous patients with severe sepsis

“…Indeed, young, healthy Indigenous adults are reported to have 30% less nephrons than non-Indigenous comparators as well as having a mean kidney volume that is 27% greater [9]. From an anthropometric perspective, the Australian Indigenous have a lower body mass, higher central fat and slimmer limbs [10]. Furthermore, they were shown to have a similar allele frequency to South Asians for some cytochrome P450 enzymes [11].…”

Anthropometric predictors of gestational hypertensive disorders in a remote aboriginal community: a nested case–control study

“…However, different ethnic groups have different body fat distributions [1-3]. Aboriginal women tend to have larger waist circumferences (WC), waist-to-hip ratios (WHR) and waist-to-height ratios (WHtR) compared to non-Aboriginal Australians [4]. Other anthropometric measurements than BMI can also be important in epidemiologic studies undertaken in Aboriginal people [5-7] due to their unique body shapes, with long-legs in proportion to their body height and low sitting height [8].…”

Quantifying the Excess Risk of Type 2 Diabetes by Body Habitus Measurements Among Australian Aborigines Living in Remote Areas

“…We have previously shown that Aboriginal body habitus profiles differ from AusDiab profiles (6). In addition, the current study demonstrates that the risk for diabetes in both sexes relative to the AusDiab participants is excessive at all levels of body size, including levels that are normal or low.…”

“…Body size was measured by standard procedures, with few differences (6). In the AusDiab study, waist and hip circumferences were measured twice, and if they varied more than 2 cm, a third measurement was taken and the mean of the two closest measurements derived.…”