2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimising meropenem dosing in critically ill Australian Indigenous patients with severe sepsis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(17 reference statements)
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final model accounted for up to 94% of the variability in meropenem concentrations and adequately fitted the drug concentration-time data. Our findings are in line with those observed in other patient populations (16,(20)(21)(22). Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem during CI was previously assessed only once, among postsurgical patients receiving the fixed dose of 3 g/day (22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The final model accounted for up to 94% of the variability in meropenem concentrations and adequately fitted the drug concentration-time data. Our findings are in line with those observed in other patient populations (16,(20)(21)(22). Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem during CI was previously assessed only once, among postsurgical patients receiving the fixed dose of 3 g/day (22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies have revealed large inter-patient variability in meropenem concentrations after standard dosing in critically ill patients [ 22 24 ], which resulted in inadequate meropenem exposure in a relevant fraction of patients [ 23 , 25 ]. However, in most of these studies, only limited numbers of patients and/or rather homogeneous patient sub-groups have been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dosing regimen for piperacillin, which was coadministered with tazobactam (Tazopip; Aspen Pharmacare, Sydney, Australia), was at the discretion of the treating intensivist. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, details of sampling, demographic data collected, and sample handling were previously published (8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%