2017
DOI: 10.1177/0146167216689051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Identification in Sports Teams

Abstract: Based on motivated identity construction theory (MICT, Vignoles, 2011), we offer an integrative approach examining the combined roles of six identity motives (self-esteem, distinctiveness, belonging, meaning, continuity and efficacy) instantiated at three different motivational levels (personal, social and collective identity) as predictors of group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social identity is considered as a key theoretical framework for understanding group functioning (Brown, 2000; Haslam, 2004; Rees et al, 2015; Thomas et al, 2017). In general, social identity refers to that part of intergroup relations that explains individuals’ behaviors – as members of an ingroup – in the presence of an outgroup (whether such presence is real, expected or imagined).…”
Section: From Social Identity To Identity-based Emotions Key Theoretmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social identity is considered as a key theoretical framework for understanding group functioning (Brown, 2000; Haslam, 2004; Rees et al, 2015; Thomas et al, 2017). In general, social identity refers to that part of intergroup relations that explains individuals’ behaviors – as members of an ingroup – in the presence of an outgroup (whether such presence is real, expected or imagined).…”
Section: From Social Identity To Identity-based Emotions Key Theoretmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Non)religious worldview motive satisfaction was studied through the social identity motives of belonging, continuity, and meaning (Thomas et al, 2017) derived from (non)religious worldviews that were introduced as the topic of the survey and this measure. The satisfaction of each motive was measured by a mean score of two items adapted from previous research (Easterbrook & Vignoles, 2012; Smeekes & Verkuyten, 2013), utilising a 7‐point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree): “My ([non]religious) worldview gives me the feeling that I am connected to other people; My ([non]religious) worldview gives me the feeling that I am accepted by other people” ( belonging ), “My ([non]religious) worldview gives me a sense of continuity—between past, present, and future; My ([non]religious) worldview gives me the feeling that I am part of a long shared history” ( continuity ), and “My ([non]religious) worldview makes my life meaningful; My ([non]religious) worldview makes my life important” ( meaning ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Non)religious worldview motive satisfaction was studied through the social identity motives of belonging, continuity, and meaning (Thomas et al, 2017) derived from (non)religious worldviews that were introduced as the topic of the survey and this measure. The satisfaction of each motive was measured by a mean score of two items adapted from previous research (Easterbrook & Vignoles, 2012;Smeekes & Verkuyten, 2013), utilising a 7-point Likert scale…”
Section: Measures and Country-specific Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we assume that the continuity of the group itself would have a positive effect on individual well-being. In addition, if individual continuity improves individual (e.g., Jiang et al, 2020;Rutt & Löckenhoff, 2016) and group (Thomas et al, 2017) well-being, collective continuity that improves social well-being could, as a mirror image, positively influence group and individual well-being. Additionally, previous findings (Herrera & Sani, 2013;Roth et al, 2017;Sani et al, 2007Sani et al, , 2008Smeekes & Verkuyten, 2015) have shown that individuals will identify more with groups that they perceive as continuous over time and that a strong perception of collective continuity also increases the perception of the group as a unitary whole (group entitativity).…”
Section: The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%