2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.726746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Experiments and Instrumental Variables with Duration Outcomes

Abstract: This paper examines the empirical analysis of treatment effects on duration outcomes from data that contain instrumental variation. We focus on social experiments in which an intention to treat is randomized and compliance may be imperfect. We distinguish between cases where the treatment starts at the moment of randomization and cases where it starts at a later point in time. We derive exclusion restrictions under various informational and behavioral assumptions and we analyze identifiability under these rest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a direct consequence of modeling heterogeneity with respect to the starting time of the treatment relative to the length of elapsed unemployment. Both the k-group and the l-group at the start of the treatment are affected by the dynamic sorting effects taking place before, see Abbring and van den Berg (2004) for a recent dis-cussion of this problem in the context of estimating duration models. Thus, the estimated treatment parameter depends dynamically on treatment decisions and outcomes in the past when taking the timing of events seriously (Abbring and van den Berg, 2003;Johansson 2003, 2004;Sianesi 2003Sianesi , 2004.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Estimated Treatment Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a direct consequence of modeling heterogeneity with respect to the starting time of the treatment relative to the length of elapsed unemployment. Both the k-group and the l-group at the start of the treatment are affected by the dynamic sorting effects taking place before, see Abbring and van den Berg (2004) for a recent dis-cussion of this problem in the context of estimating duration models. Thus, the estimated treatment parameter depends dynamically on treatment decisions and outcomes in the past when taking the timing of events seriously (Abbring and van den Berg, 2003;Johansson 2003, 2004;Sianesi 2003Sianesi , 2004.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Estimated Treatment Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a direct consequence of modelling heterogeneity with respect to the starting time of the treatment relative to the length of elapsed unemployment. Both the treatment group and the group of nonparticipants at the start of the treatment are affected by the dynamic sorting effects taking place before, see Abbring and van den Berg (2004) for a recent discussion of this problem in the context of estimating duration models. Thus, the estimated treatment parameter depends dynamically on treatment decision and outcomes in the past when taking the timing of events seriously (Abbring and van den Berg, 2003;Fredriksson and Johanson, 2003;Sianesi, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bond and Shaw (2003) obtain bounds for covariate effects under the assumption that the copula associated with the joint distribution of latent failure times is invariant to the value of covariates. Abbring and Van den Berg (2005) apply the result of Bond and Shaw (2003) to bound the treatment effects on duration outcomes. Honoré and Lleras-Muney (2004) derive bounds in an accelerated failure time competing risks model with discrete covariates.…”
Section: We Have That E[b(t X)b(t X)mentioning
confidence: 99%