2006
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/93.4.996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a competing risks model with unknown transformations of latent failure times

Abstract: This paper is concerned with identification of a competing risks model with unknown transformations of latent failure times. The model in this paper includes, as special cases, competing risks versions of proportional hazards, mixed proportional hazards, and accelerated failure time models. It is shown that covariate effects on latent failure times, cause-specific link functions, and the joint survivor function of the disturbance terms can be identified without relying on modelling the dependence between laten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependence of our result on covariates is analogous to identifiability results in the competing risks literature. A number of authors have put forward identifiable competing risks models; and all of the results depend on the presence of covariates in the models (Heckman and Honore 1989; Abbring and van den Berg 2003; Lee 2006). …”
Section: Estimating Equations and Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of our result on covariates is analogous to identifiability results in the competing risks literature. A number of authors have put forward identifiable competing risks models; and all of the results depend on the presence of covariates in the models (Heckman and Honore 1989; Abbring and van den Berg 2003; Lee 2006). …”
Section: Estimating Equations and Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification result of Lee (2006) also does not depend on either identification near zero or exclusion assumption. Lee shows that a parametrically specified g(x) can be identified up to scale and location normalization for a class of transformation models that include accelerated failure time competing risks models as special cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Abbring and Van den Berg (2003) provide weaker conditions than those assumed in Heckman and Honoré for the mixed proportional hazards competing risks model. Lee (2006) develops an identification result for a competing risks transformation model. Buera (2006) develops non-parametric identification and testable implications of the Roy model using assumptions that are distinct from ours, such as the continuity of regressors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interested readers are referred to Heckman and Taber () and Crowder () for comprehensive reviews. Extra difficulties arise because the conditional survival copula function changes with x , in contrast with the existing literature that assumes an invariant copula, such as in Heckman and Honoré (), Abbring and van den Berg (), and Lee and Lewbel (). The conditional survival copula reveals that the current model does not fit into the framework in Fan and Liu (), since the conditional survivor copula is neither Archimedean, nor does it admit a copula density function for dependent Lévy subordinators.…”
Section: Identification and Estimation With Competing Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%